01.03.2017 Views

Towards a Better Future

A Review of the Irish School System John Coolahan | Sheelagh Drudy Pádraig Hogan | Áine Hyland | Séamus McGuinness

A Review of the Irish School System
John Coolahan | Sheelagh Drudy Pádraig Hogan | Áine Hyland | Séamus McGuinness

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Towards</strong> a <strong>Better</strong> <strong>Future</strong>: A Review of the Irish School System<br />

national curricular reforms; but not if conceived in ‘delivery’ formats that fail to engage teachers and<br />

school leavers in sustained, constructive ways. Secondly, the four-and-a-half days in question mean<br />

a loss of teaching time. Even if cover is provided, what students are receiving is something other than,<br />

and normally less than, what their entitlement should be. This underlines the necessity for a more<br />

strategic provision, as suggested below.<br />

The provision of time for professional development would be more appropriately viewed as one<br />

element in a larger package of measures addressing a range of issues that have caused disquiet in<br />

recent years, or even for decades (curriculum, assessment, different pay scales for the same work,<br />

removal of promotion posts etc.) Chapter 11 of this review provides some illuminating comparative<br />

data on how time in school is spent in the different jurisdictions covered by OECD surveys. For<br />

instance, a study of that data (Ch. 11, Fig.3) shows that the quantity of teaching time in lower<br />

secondary school in Ireland is higher than the OECD average. The point is also made in that chapter<br />

that the proportion of statutory working time spent in teaching in Ireland is by far the highest of<br />

the OECD countries.<br />

To conclude, the larger question of a package of measures that properly reflects the changed nature<br />

of teaching in the 21st century needs to be properly acknowledged and tackled. Unless this happens,<br />

professional development for Ireland’s teachers is likely to be attenuated, as distinct from progressive,<br />

in the years ahead. Nor is it likely to receive the central importance it receives in practices like<br />

nursing, pharmacy or medicine.<br />

(d) The role of Education Centres<br />

The Education Centres have a central role to play in a national framework for professional<br />

development for teachers. They are referred to in Cosán mainly as workshop locations for gathering<br />

feedback in consultations with teachers (pp.5, 12), though there is a reference to them as ‘learning<br />

hubs’ in the Appendix to the draft of the Cosán document published in May 2015 (p.23). The<br />

strategic and active role of the Education Centres needs to be fully acknowledged and promoted.<br />

This includes not only their role as venues for providing courses under the auspices of PDST or any<br />

of the national support services. Equally significant is their leadership and developmental role, for<br />

instance, in designing and providing participatory seminars or programmes that cultivate professional<br />

learning communities among teachers. The Education Centres are key players in planning and<br />

implementing the modular, credit-bearing system mentioned under headings (a) and (b) above.<br />

(e) The role of Professional Associations<br />

Professional associations like IPPN and NAPD are primarily seen as support and advocacy bodies<br />

for their own members. Of course, they are that, but their members are themselves the leaders of<br />

professional practice in the schools. The wealth of insight and expertise accumulated by members<br />

as practitioners of educational leadership is an invaluable resource for professional development of<br />

— 162 —

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!