Towards a Better Future
A Review of the Irish School System John Coolahan | Sheelagh Drudy Pádraig Hogan | Áine Hyland | Séamus McGuinness
A Review of the Irish School System
John Coolahan | Sheelagh Drudy Pádraig Hogan | Áine Hyland | Séamus McGuinness
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Towards</strong> a <strong>Better</strong> <strong>Future</strong>: A Review of the Irish School System<br />
national curricular reforms; but not if conceived in ‘delivery’ formats that fail to engage teachers and<br />
school leavers in sustained, constructive ways. Secondly, the four-and-a-half days in question mean<br />
a loss of teaching time. Even if cover is provided, what students are receiving is something other than,<br />
and normally less than, what their entitlement should be. This underlines the necessity for a more<br />
strategic provision, as suggested below.<br />
The provision of time for professional development would be more appropriately viewed as one<br />
element in a larger package of measures addressing a range of issues that have caused disquiet in<br />
recent years, or even for decades (curriculum, assessment, different pay scales for the same work,<br />
removal of promotion posts etc.) Chapter 11 of this review provides some illuminating comparative<br />
data on how time in school is spent in the different jurisdictions covered by OECD surveys. For<br />
instance, a study of that data (Ch. 11, Fig.3) shows that the quantity of teaching time in lower<br />
secondary school in Ireland is higher than the OECD average. The point is also made in that chapter<br />
that the proportion of statutory working time spent in teaching in Ireland is by far the highest of<br />
the OECD countries.<br />
To conclude, the larger question of a package of measures that properly reflects the changed nature<br />
of teaching in the 21st century needs to be properly acknowledged and tackled. Unless this happens,<br />
professional development for Ireland’s teachers is likely to be attenuated, as distinct from progressive,<br />
in the years ahead. Nor is it likely to receive the central importance it receives in practices like<br />
nursing, pharmacy or medicine.<br />
(d) The role of Education Centres<br />
The Education Centres have a central role to play in a national framework for professional<br />
development for teachers. They are referred to in Cosán mainly as workshop locations for gathering<br />
feedback in consultations with teachers (pp.5, 12), though there is a reference to them as ‘learning<br />
hubs’ in the Appendix to the draft of the Cosán document published in May 2015 (p.23). The<br />
strategic and active role of the Education Centres needs to be fully acknowledged and promoted.<br />
This includes not only their role as venues for providing courses under the auspices of PDST or any<br />
of the national support services. Equally significant is their leadership and developmental role, for<br />
instance, in designing and providing participatory seminars or programmes that cultivate professional<br />
learning communities among teachers. The Education Centres are key players in planning and<br />
implementing the modular, credit-bearing system mentioned under headings (a) and (b) above.<br />
(e) The role of Professional Associations<br />
Professional associations like IPPN and NAPD are primarily seen as support and advocacy bodies<br />
for their own members. Of course, they are that, but their members are themselves the leaders of<br />
professional practice in the schools. The wealth of insight and expertise accumulated by members<br />
as practitioners of educational leadership is an invaluable resource for professional development of<br />
— 162 —