charles_darwin
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
78<br />
CHARLES DARWIN AND THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES<br />
accommodate the millennia required for evolution to occur was<br />
finally demonstrated to be incorrect. Third, and even more significant,<br />
the science of genetics looked likely to provide the answer to<br />
the question that Darwin could not answer in The Origin of Species:<br />
how and why natural selection worked. Two of the major problems<br />
with the ideas Darwin developed in The Origin of Species began to<br />
recede. The period from 1930 onward was the beginning of a new<br />
era for the reception of The Origin of Species.<br />
The Scopes Trial is evidence that the year 1930 did not mark<br />
the end of the debate about and opposition to the ideas in The Origin<br />
of Species. In fact, in the years after 1925, Christian opponents of<br />
evolution formed a new group whose approach to science was more<br />
like the majority of society in the twentieth century. Calling themselves<br />
creationists, these Christians used the newest findings in geology<br />
to develop ideas about the age of the Earth and the impact of<br />
the flood mentioned in the book of Genesis: they used modern science<br />
to defend the Bible.<br />
The difference between 1930 and 1900 was the way in which<br />
scientists and the educated public perceived The Origin of Species. In<br />
1900, it was possible that scientists might ignore, discount, or even<br />
reject Darwin’s theories. That was not the case after 1930. Darwin’s<br />
theory needed more refinement—not until the discovery of the structure<br />
of DNA and RNA in the 1950s would scientists be able to<br />
explain how genes worked and the connection between genes and<br />
mutation—but scientists still accepted the majority of Darwin’s<br />
theory as he wrote it in The Origin of Species. The linking of genetics,<br />
statistical analysis of the growth of populations, and the research<br />
of naturalists in the 1930s and 1940s led to what scientists called<br />
‘‘the grand synthesis’’ in the 1950s. The action of natural selection<br />
and why it occurred could be explained by the mutation of genes.<br />
This agreement on the mechanism of evolution was called Neo-<br />
Darwinism. The ideas of The Origin of Species now had a permanent<br />
place in Western and world thought.<br />
The Scopes Trial and Renewed Opposition to<br />
Evolution<br />
In 1940, the British theologian Vernon Faithfull Storr wrote:<br />
The panic caused by the publication in 1859 of The Origin of<br />
Species appears to us today almost unbelievable. The doctrine of<br />
evolution was regarded as materialistic and atheistic in tendency.