04.03.2017 Views

charles_darwin

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Darwin, Darwinism, and Evolution in the Twentieth Century<br />

Episcopal bishop of Newark between 1976 and 2000, ‘‘we are living<br />

in a post-Darwinian world.’’ 11 Both men were drawing attention to<br />

the profound significance of Darwin’s theory. Although descent by<br />

modification would not be the foundation of the theory of evolution<br />

without the work of many scientists, the man who proposed the idea<br />

must receive the appropriate credit. In the twentieth century, the<br />

connection between genetics and evolution would not be complete<br />

without the work of Rosalind Franklin (1920–1958), Francis Crick<br />

(1916–2004), and James Watson (1928–) on the structure of DNA.<br />

Measuring the age of the Earth in billions rather than a few million<br />

years would not have been possible without the research on light<br />

and relativity by Albert Einstein (1879–1955) and Henri Poincare<br />

(1854–1912). The whole community of scientists, not just biologists<br />

or naturalists, was responsible for working out the details of the<br />

theory of evolution in the twentieth century. No individual can claim<br />

preeminence for his or her contribution. All were vital. However,<br />

Darwin deserves a position of prominence among these scientists<br />

because it was his work that stimulated so much of the scientific<br />

research and writing on evolution in the twentieth century.<br />

Darwin’s legacy was that his ideas in The Origin of Species were<br />

still being debated and applied. Sometimes these discussions resulted<br />

in developments that would be repudiated later in the century—the<br />

Eugenics Movement, for example. For some in the twentieth century,<br />

Darwin’s ideas could not be reconciled with their beliefs, and they<br />

continued to oppose evolution. In other developments, scientists<br />

seemed to be finding ways for humans to better understand themselves<br />

and their surroundings. The work of ecologists, sociobiologists,<br />

and evolutionary psychologists led to a recognition that<br />

humankind should recognize itself as part of nature rather than the<br />

lord of nature. As the many reactions to his work demonstrated,<br />

Darwin and The Origin of Species were among the major topics of<br />

debate in the twentieth century.<br />

85<br />

Notes<br />

1. Edward J. Larson, Summer for the Gods: The Scopes Trial and America’s<br />

Continuing Debate over Science and Religion (New York: Basic Books,<br />

1997), 3–8.<br />

2. Vernon Faithfull Storr, Freedom and Tradition: A Study of Liberal<br />

Evangelicalism (London: Nisbet and Co. Ltd., 1940), 1230–1231.<br />

3. William Jennings Bryan, In His Image (New York: Fleming H.<br />

Revell Company, 1922), 88.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!