04.03.2017 Views

charles_darwin

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

128<br />

Primary Documents Relating to Darwin and Darwinism<br />

grasp both the causes of the progress and of the interruptions<br />

in it.<br />

When once we have recognised that a thing is useful and<br />

indeed indispensable for the end in view and that it is free from<br />

drawbacks, we should hasten to carry it into execution although<br />

it is contrary to custom.<br />

This is the case with regard to the way in which a general<br />

classification of animals should be drawn up.<br />

We shall see that it is not a matter of indifference from<br />

which end we begin this general classification of animals, and<br />

that the beginning of the order is not a mere matter of choice.<br />

The existing custom of placing at the head of the animal<br />

kingdom the most perfect animals, and of terminating this kingdom<br />

with the most imperfect and simplest in organisation, is due,<br />

on the one hand, to that natural prejudice towards giving the<br />

preference to the objects which strike us most or in which we are<br />

most pleased or interested; and, on the other hand, to the preference<br />

for passing from the better known to what is less known.<br />

When the study of natural history began to occupy attention<br />

these reasons were no doubt very plausible; but they must<br />

now yield to the needs of science and especially to those facilitating<br />

the progress of natural knowledge.<br />

With regard to the numerous and varied animals which nature<br />

has produced, if we cannot flatter ourselves that we possess<br />

an exact knowledge of the real order which she followed in<br />

bringing them successively into existence, it is nevertheless true<br />

that the order which I am about to set forth is probably very<br />

near it: reason and all our acquired knowledge testify in favour<br />

of this probability.<br />

If indeed it is true that all living bodies are productions of<br />

nature, we are driven to the belief that she can only have produced<br />

them one after another and not all in a moment. Now if<br />

she shaped them one after another, there are grounds for thinking<br />

that she began exclusively with the simplest, and only produced<br />

at the very end the most complex organisations both of<br />

the animal and vegetable kingdoms.<br />

To assist us to a judgment as to whether the idea of species<br />

has any real foundations, let us revert to the principles already<br />

set forth; they show:<br />

(1) That all the organised bodies of our earth are true<br />

productions of nature, wrought successively throughout long<br />

periods of time.<br />

(2) That in her procedure, nature began and still begins by<br />

fashioning the simplest of organised bodies, and that it is these<br />

alone which she fashions immediately, that is to say, only the<br />

rudiments of organisation indicated in the term spontaneous<br />

generation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!