charles_darwin
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
128<br />
Primary Documents Relating to Darwin and Darwinism<br />
grasp both the causes of the progress and of the interruptions<br />
in it.<br />
When once we have recognised that a thing is useful and<br />
indeed indispensable for the end in view and that it is free from<br />
drawbacks, we should hasten to carry it into execution although<br />
it is contrary to custom.<br />
This is the case with regard to the way in which a general<br />
classification of animals should be drawn up.<br />
We shall see that it is not a matter of indifference from<br />
which end we begin this general classification of animals, and<br />
that the beginning of the order is not a mere matter of choice.<br />
The existing custom of placing at the head of the animal<br />
kingdom the most perfect animals, and of terminating this kingdom<br />
with the most imperfect and simplest in organisation, is due,<br />
on the one hand, to that natural prejudice towards giving the<br />
preference to the objects which strike us most or in which we are<br />
most pleased or interested; and, on the other hand, to the preference<br />
for passing from the better known to what is less known.<br />
When the study of natural history began to occupy attention<br />
these reasons were no doubt very plausible; but they must<br />
now yield to the needs of science and especially to those facilitating<br />
the progress of natural knowledge.<br />
With regard to the numerous and varied animals which nature<br />
has produced, if we cannot flatter ourselves that we possess<br />
an exact knowledge of the real order which she followed in<br />
bringing them successively into existence, it is nevertheless true<br />
that the order which I am about to set forth is probably very<br />
near it: reason and all our acquired knowledge testify in favour<br />
of this probability.<br />
If indeed it is true that all living bodies are productions of<br />
nature, we are driven to the belief that she can only have produced<br />
them one after another and not all in a moment. Now if<br />
she shaped them one after another, there are grounds for thinking<br />
that she began exclusively with the simplest, and only produced<br />
at the very end the most complex organisations both of<br />
the animal and vegetable kingdoms.<br />
To assist us to a judgment as to whether the idea of species<br />
has any real foundations, let us revert to the principles already<br />
set forth; they show:<br />
(1) That all the organised bodies of our earth are true<br />
productions of nature, wrought successively throughout long<br />
periods of time.<br />
(2) That in her procedure, nature began and still begins by<br />
fashioning the simplest of organised bodies, and that it is these<br />
alone which she fashions immediately, that is to say, only the<br />
rudiments of organisation indicated in the term spontaneous<br />
generation.