charles_darwin
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
74<br />
CHARLES DARWIN AND THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES<br />
contemporaneously, the actual topic of discussion was evolution.<br />
This was especially true of the discussion, debates, and writing of<br />
Christian opponents of Darwin’s ideas. Their concern was much less<br />
about the specific ideas in The Origin of Species and much more<br />
focused on the implications of the theory of evolution. They worried<br />
about Darwinism rather than Darwin. Darwinism was synonymous<br />
with evolution in the minds of Christian opponents: and evolution<br />
was the danger, or evil, that had to be challenged. 27<br />
According to William Jennings Bryan (1860–1925), the populist<br />
politician and three-time candidate for president of the United States,<br />
a naturalist scientific theory supported a materialist approach to life.<br />
Materialism, living life as though God did not exist or was not important,<br />
led to excessive capitalism, imperialism and a world war,<br />
and a society with no moral foundation. Other Christian opponents<br />
of Darwinism echoed these claims.<br />
Was evolution a good (in the moral sense) theory? At the beginning<br />
of the twentieth century, the question of the effect on society<br />
of accepting a theory of evolution became a greater concern to Christian<br />
opponents of Darwinism. The impact of the theory on belief in<br />
the creation story in the Bible was troubling; however, looking at the<br />
state of the world, what these opponents saw as the collapse in society’s<br />
morals was far worse. From 1920 onward, the social impact of<br />
the theory of evolution was as much a part of the twentieth-century<br />
debate about Darwin and The Origin of Species as were the disputes<br />
among scientists about the mechanism of evolution.<br />
Notes<br />
1. The Origin of Species, 481–482.<br />
2. Ibid., 482.<br />
3. Darwin recognized this in the chapters ‘‘Difficulties on Theory’’<br />
and ‘‘Recapitulation and Conclusion.’’ See The Origin of Species, 171–172,<br />
459–466.<br />
4. Alfred Russel Wallace, Darwinism: An Exposition of the Theory of<br />
Natural Selection with Some of its Applications (London: Macmillan, 1889), v.<br />
5. In Darwin’s defense, the German pathologist and biologist Rudolf<br />
Virchow (1821–1902) did not propose his theory that cells were the basic<br />
building blocks of every living organism until 1858. Cytology, the study of<br />
cells, was a very new science, dating from the 1840s.<br />
6. Wallace, Darwinism, vi. Wallace did some of the measurements he<br />
suggested; see Darwinism, 47, 48, 51, 53, 55, 56, 58, 60–61, 67, 72–73.<br />
7. Ibid., vi–viii.