04.03.2017 Views

charles_darwin

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

74<br />

CHARLES DARWIN AND THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES<br />

contemporaneously, the actual topic of discussion was evolution.<br />

This was especially true of the discussion, debates, and writing of<br />

Christian opponents of Darwin’s ideas. Their concern was much less<br />

about the specific ideas in The Origin of Species and much more<br />

focused on the implications of the theory of evolution. They worried<br />

about Darwinism rather than Darwin. Darwinism was synonymous<br />

with evolution in the minds of Christian opponents: and evolution<br />

was the danger, or evil, that had to be challenged. 27<br />

According to William Jennings Bryan (1860–1925), the populist<br />

politician and three-time candidate for president of the United States,<br />

a naturalist scientific theory supported a materialist approach to life.<br />

Materialism, living life as though God did not exist or was not important,<br />

led to excessive capitalism, imperialism and a world war,<br />

and a society with no moral foundation. Other Christian opponents<br />

of Darwinism echoed these claims.<br />

Was evolution a good (in the moral sense) theory? At the beginning<br />

of the twentieth century, the question of the effect on society<br />

of accepting a theory of evolution became a greater concern to Christian<br />

opponents of Darwinism. The impact of the theory on belief in<br />

the creation story in the Bible was troubling; however, looking at the<br />

state of the world, what these opponents saw as the collapse in society’s<br />

morals was far worse. From 1920 onward, the social impact of<br />

the theory of evolution was as much a part of the twentieth-century<br />

debate about Darwin and The Origin of Species as were the disputes<br />

among scientists about the mechanism of evolution.<br />

Notes<br />

1. The Origin of Species, 481–482.<br />

2. Ibid., 482.<br />

3. Darwin recognized this in the chapters ‘‘Difficulties on Theory’’<br />

and ‘‘Recapitulation and Conclusion.’’ See The Origin of Species, 171–172,<br />

459–466.<br />

4. Alfred Russel Wallace, Darwinism: An Exposition of the Theory of<br />

Natural Selection with Some of its Applications (London: Macmillan, 1889), v.<br />

5. In Darwin’s defense, the German pathologist and biologist Rudolf<br />

Virchow (1821–1902) did not propose his theory that cells were the basic<br />

building blocks of every living organism until 1858. Cytology, the study of<br />

cells, was a very new science, dating from the 1840s.<br />

6. Wallace, Darwinism, vi. Wallace did some of the measurements he<br />

suggested; see Darwinism, 47, 48, 51, 53, 55, 56, 58, 60–61, 67, 72–73.<br />

7. Ibid., vi–viii.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!