04.03.2017 Views

charles_darwin

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

48<br />

CHARLES DARWIN AND THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES<br />

his classification of the animal kingdom. A version of Lamarck’s system<br />

is still used today.<br />

These classifiers discovered three important facts by the beginning<br />

of the nineteenth century: there were an incredibly large number<br />

of species and varieties in the world, the number was increasing,<br />

and the number could be increased artificially. Furthermore, such<br />

was the fecundity of species and varieties that it was difficult at times<br />

to distinguish whether a plant or animal was a variety or a new species.<br />

Commenting on the propensity of a fellow botanist Charles<br />

Babington (1808–1895) to find new species, Hewett Cottrell Watson<br />

(1804–1881) supposedly remarked that there were ‘‘species, subspecies,<br />

and Bab-ies.’’ 6<br />

Both breeders and naturalists began to speculate about the<br />

meaning of the diversity of organic life. Why were there so many<br />

species? Based on the scientific assumptions of the day, there was no<br />

obvious answer to this question. But were all species created at the<br />

same time? That question, however, did have an answer: ‘‘no.’’<br />

According to the British veterinary surgeon William Youatt (1776–<br />

1847) some breeders could ‘‘summon into life whatever form and<br />

mould [they pleased].’’ 7 If that was possible, then someone needed<br />

to propose a new theory about the origin of species. Humans, it<br />

seemed, were just as capable of changing nature as Paley’s intelligent<br />

creator. These facts became important elements of Darwin’s theory of<br />

descent by modification.<br />

The Uniqueness of The Origin of Species and Darwin’s<br />

Debts to Other Thinkers<br />

Given the debates in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries,<br />

Darwin did not write The Origin of Species in a vacuum. It may have<br />

been a ‘‘glorious book’’ with ‘‘a mass of close reasoning on curious<br />

facts and fresh phenomena,’’ according to Joseph Hooker, but Darwin’s<br />

theory of descent by modification was based solidly on the<br />

knowledge of his day. 8 For example, Thomas Malthus’s theory about<br />

the shortage of food affecting the growth of the population gave<br />

Darwin the idea that different species had to compete for resources:<br />

Darwin called this ‘‘the struggle for existence.’’ Charles Lyell’s theory<br />

of uniformitarianism in geology—that the changes in the Earth take<br />

place gradually over eons—gave Darwin the idea that the transmutation<br />

of species must be a slow process that occurred over a long period<br />

of time. Darwin acknowledged the importance of Malthus and<br />

Lyell to his theory both in The Origin of Species and his other<br />

writings. 9 But equally clear in The Origin of Species is the debt

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!