charles_darwin
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
48<br />
CHARLES DARWIN AND THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES<br />
his classification of the animal kingdom. A version of Lamarck’s system<br />
is still used today.<br />
These classifiers discovered three important facts by the beginning<br />
of the nineteenth century: there were an incredibly large number<br />
of species and varieties in the world, the number was increasing,<br />
and the number could be increased artificially. Furthermore, such<br />
was the fecundity of species and varieties that it was difficult at times<br />
to distinguish whether a plant or animal was a variety or a new species.<br />
Commenting on the propensity of a fellow botanist Charles<br />
Babington (1808–1895) to find new species, Hewett Cottrell Watson<br />
(1804–1881) supposedly remarked that there were ‘‘species, subspecies,<br />
and Bab-ies.’’ 6<br />
Both breeders and naturalists began to speculate about the<br />
meaning of the diversity of organic life. Why were there so many<br />
species? Based on the scientific assumptions of the day, there was no<br />
obvious answer to this question. But were all species created at the<br />
same time? That question, however, did have an answer: ‘‘no.’’<br />
According to the British veterinary surgeon William Youatt (1776–<br />
1847) some breeders could ‘‘summon into life whatever form and<br />
mould [they pleased].’’ 7 If that was possible, then someone needed<br />
to propose a new theory about the origin of species. Humans, it<br />
seemed, were just as capable of changing nature as Paley’s intelligent<br />
creator. These facts became important elements of Darwin’s theory of<br />
descent by modification.<br />
The Uniqueness of The Origin of Species and Darwin’s<br />
Debts to Other Thinkers<br />
Given the debates in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries,<br />
Darwin did not write The Origin of Species in a vacuum. It may have<br />
been a ‘‘glorious book’’ with ‘‘a mass of close reasoning on curious<br />
facts and fresh phenomena,’’ according to Joseph Hooker, but Darwin’s<br />
theory of descent by modification was based solidly on the<br />
knowledge of his day. 8 For example, Thomas Malthus’s theory about<br />
the shortage of food affecting the growth of the population gave<br />
Darwin the idea that different species had to compete for resources:<br />
Darwin called this ‘‘the struggle for existence.’’ Charles Lyell’s theory<br />
of uniformitarianism in geology—that the changes in the Earth take<br />
place gradually over eons—gave Darwin the idea that the transmutation<br />
of species must be a slow process that occurred over a long period<br />
of time. Darwin acknowledged the importance of Malthus and<br />
Lyell to his theory both in The Origin of Species and his other<br />
writings. 9 But equally clear in The Origin of Species is the debt