charles_darwin
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
72<br />
CHARLES DARWIN AND THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES<br />
evolve. For Cope, in particular, that internal mechanism was placed<br />
in each organism by God.<br />
A third group of scientists, sometimes called saltationists but<br />
more often Mendelians, argued that evolution sometimes occurred in<br />
rapid spurts or could occur suddenly: slow and steady transformation<br />
was unnecessary. As early as 1859, in his letter congratulating<br />
Darwin on the brilliance of The Origin of Species, Thomas Huxley<br />
wrote, ‘‘You have loaded yourself with an unnecessary difficulty in<br />
adopting ‘Natura non facit saltum’ so unreservedly. I believe she does<br />
make small jumps’’ 24 In 1900, the rediscovery of Gregor Mendel’s<br />
research on heredity by the botanists Carl Erich Correns (1864–<br />
1933), Erich Tschermak von Seysenegg (1871–1962), and Hugo de<br />
Vries seemed to reveal a new and more plausible explanation for<br />
evolution. The idea that discrete genetic units were passed on from<br />
one generation to another was, to the Mendelians, a more systematic<br />
and mathematically simple way of explaining inheritance. In 1901,<br />
de Vries published the first extended explanation of what he called<br />
‘‘the mutation theory’’ in a book with the same title. His ideas, particularly<br />
the transmission of sudden mutations by genes, were supported<br />
and disseminated by the research of three men in particular:<br />
the British biologist William Bateson (1861–1926), who coined the<br />
term genetics; the American biologist Thomas Hunt Morgan (1866–<br />
1945), whose experiments on fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster)<br />
established the theory that chromosomes are involved in heredity;<br />
and the Danish botanist Wilhelm Johannsen (1857–1927), whose<br />
distinction between genotype, the genetic constitution of an organism,<br />
and phenotype, the physical characteristics of an organism, are<br />
an important foundation of modern genetics.<br />
The most important consequence of the discussions and disputes<br />
among scientists was that Darwin’s theory about evolution was<br />
virtually ignored. Scientists sought alternative explanations for the<br />
reason why evolution occurred. They were debating the ideas in The<br />
Origin of Species very tangentially. Apart from one or two proponents,<br />
such as Alfred Wallace, Darwinism as Darwin understood it<br />
was a dead theory. Looking back on the period from 1880 to 1920,<br />
the British zoologist Julian Huxley (1887–1975), the grandson of<br />
Thomas Huxley, called it ‘‘the eclipse of Darwinism.’’ 25<br />
Public Reaction to Darwin<br />
The numerous disagreements among scientists about the mechanism<br />
of evolution had unfortunate timing. They occurred just as