04.03.2017 Views

charles_darwin

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Origin of Species<br />

poetically in Paradise Lost: describe creation in a way that illustrated<br />

and conformed to the literal text of the Bible. Aubrey Moore (1848–<br />

1890), another British theologian and philosopher, argued that the fixity<br />

of species was a theological, rather than a scientific, idea—although<br />

prominent scientists such as the Swede Carl Linnaeus (1707–1778)<br />

and Cuvier supported it. 4 John Ray had written about the fixity of the<br />

species in books such as The Wisdom of God Manifested in the Works of<br />

the Creation (1691), but Storr was incorrect when he suggested that<br />

Ray was the author of the doctrine. The idea predated Ray by many<br />

centuries. The fixity of species was simply one answer to a question<br />

posed by many people living before and after Charles Darwin: from<br />

where did all the species on the Earth originate?<br />

45<br />

William Paley and the Divine Watchmaker<br />

Before the publication of The Origin of Species the most popular<br />

answer to the question of origins was the one provided by the British<br />

theologian William Paley (1743–1805). In his two books A View of<br />

the Evidences of Christianity (1794) and Natural Theology: or, Evidences<br />

of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, Collected from the<br />

Appearances of Nature (1802), Paley explained what is called natural<br />

theology. Natural theology provided a unique answer to the questions<br />

about extinct species and the fixity of species. The answer was<br />

persuasive enough to convince most of the scientists of Darwin’s time<br />

that any theory of evolution used to explain the origin of species<br />

must be wrong.<br />

Paley’s natural theology contained three major ideas. First, nature<br />

was a source of information about God and Christianity. Anybody,<br />

even someone without access to an organized religious<br />

institution, could learn about the god of Christianity. People did not<br />

need to read the Bible or know a set of doctrines: they just had to<br />

look at the organization, beauty, and complexity of nature. Second,<br />

studying nature would lead a person to accept the belief that God<br />

created the universe and is in control of it. People could become<br />

Christians simply by studying nature. Third, studying nature reveals<br />

that God’s creation is ordered and logical. There are reasonable<br />

explanations for all the phenomena of nature.<br />

Paley’s objective in his two books was to convince his readers<br />

that Christianity made sense. According to Paley, Christianity was<br />

true because it was logical. The truths of the Bible as expressed in<br />

the doctrines of the Christian Church were confirmed by nature. The<br />

order in nature, natural theology, was another way to learn about<br />

Biblical doctrines, called revealed theology. And why was the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!