charles_darwin
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The Origin of Species<br />
poetically in Paradise Lost: describe creation in a way that illustrated<br />
and conformed to the literal text of the Bible. Aubrey Moore (1848–<br />
1890), another British theologian and philosopher, argued that the fixity<br />
of species was a theological, rather than a scientific, idea—although<br />
prominent scientists such as the Swede Carl Linnaeus (1707–1778)<br />
and Cuvier supported it. 4 John Ray had written about the fixity of the<br />
species in books such as The Wisdom of God Manifested in the Works of<br />
the Creation (1691), but Storr was incorrect when he suggested that<br />
Ray was the author of the doctrine. The idea predated Ray by many<br />
centuries. The fixity of species was simply one answer to a question<br />
posed by many people living before and after Charles Darwin: from<br />
where did all the species on the Earth originate?<br />
45<br />
William Paley and the Divine Watchmaker<br />
Before the publication of The Origin of Species the most popular<br />
answer to the question of origins was the one provided by the British<br />
theologian William Paley (1743–1805). In his two books A View of<br />
the Evidences of Christianity (1794) and Natural Theology: or, Evidences<br />
of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, Collected from the<br />
Appearances of Nature (1802), Paley explained what is called natural<br />
theology. Natural theology provided a unique answer to the questions<br />
about extinct species and the fixity of species. The answer was<br />
persuasive enough to convince most of the scientists of Darwin’s time<br />
that any theory of evolution used to explain the origin of species<br />
must be wrong.<br />
Paley’s natural theology contained three major ideas. First, nature<br />
was a source of information about God and Christianity. Anybody,<br />
even someone without access to an organized religious<br />
institution, could learn about the god of Christianity. People did not<br />
need to read the Bible or know a set of doctrines: they just had to<br />
look at the organization, beauty, and complexity of nature. Second,<br />
studying nature would lead a person to accept the belief that God<br />
created the universe and is in control of it. People could become<br />
Christians simply by studying nature. Third, studying nature reveals<br />
that God’s creation is ordered and logical. There are reasonable<br />
explanations for all the phenomena of nature.<br />
Paley’s objective in his two books was to convince his readers<br />
that Christianity made sense. According to Paley, Christianity was<br />
true because it was logical. The truths of the Bible as expressed in<br />
the doctrines of the Christian Church were confirmed by nature. The<br />
order in nature, natural theology, was another way to learn about<br />
Biblical doctrines, called revealed theology. And why was the