charles_darwin
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
32<br />
CHARLES DARWIN AND THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES<br />
passed before Darwin turned his full concentration to his work on<br />
species.<br />
Some of Darwin’s biographers have drawn attention to Darwin’s<br />
concern about publishing his theory about the origin of species.<br />
These biographers suggest that Darwin realized that his theory was<br />
so heretical (in the Christian sense of the word), so opposite to the<br />
prevailing view about the origins of life that he deliberately delayed<br />
publishing his ideas publicly. This suggestion has some merit. His<br />
‘‘confession’’ to Hooker is proof that Darwin was worried. And it did<br />
take more than twenty years before Darwin’s first musings about<br />
transmutation became the book The Origin of Species.<br />
Darwin did worry about the furor that his theory might cause,<br />
but it is inaccurate to blame only this concern for the ‘‘delay’’ in publication.<br />
Darwin disliked controversy: ‘‘I rejoice that I have avoided<br />
controversies,’’ he wrote in 1881, ‘‘and this I owe to Lyell, who many<br />
years ago ... strongly advised me never to get entangled in a controversy,<br />
as it rarely did any good and caused a miserable loss of time<br />
and temper.’’ 45 Furthermore, a controversy had already erupted in<br />
1844 over the origin of species. The book Vestiges of the Natural History<br />
of Creation was published that year. The author was unknown:<br />
only posthumously was Robert Chambers (1802–1871), a Scottish<br />
publisher and amateur geologist, revealed as the author. The book’s<br />
support for transformism—the idea that the evolution of species was<br />
proof that society could progress to become more egalitarian, for<br />
example—did cause a furor, particularly as the scientific evidence<br />
Chambers gave for evolution was not convincing. 46 Equally important,<br />
Darwin was concerned about his wife Emma. He did not want<br />
to upset her by publishing a theory that seemed to oppose or undermine<br />
the Christian explanation of the origin of species. Emma, like<br />
Darwin’s sisters, was very religious.<br />
But it is too easy to focus on these concerns because they fit so<br />
well into a story of the outbreak of the ‘‘Ôwar’’ between science and<br />
religion. Without doubt, the delay in the completion of The Origin of<br />
Species was mainly due to the character of the man. Darwin was a<br />
cautious person. He was certainly of a very different temperament<br />
from Alfred Wallace who could work out a theory of natural selection<br />
during three days of torrid thinking and write down his conclusions<br />
in an essay immediately. Darwin’s method of work was slow<br />
and methodical. He preferred to accumulate facts over a long period<br />
of time, think about the ways these facts related to each other, and<br />
then fit them together into a large synthesis. This approach was not<br />
the kind that would produce an academic paper or a book in a week,<br />
a month, or even a year. ‘‘I gained much by my delay in publishing