27.03.2017 Views

URBANIZATION AND INDUSTRIALIZATION

Economic%20Report%20on%20Africa%202017%20UNECA

Economic%20Report%20on%20Africa%202017%20UNECA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.4 OVERCOMING BARRIERS TO AGGLOMERATION<br />

ECONOMIES WITHIN CITIES<br />

The power of agglomeration economies gives<br />

large cities a major productive advantage. Firms<br />

in cities have better access to labour, markets,<br />

inputs and knowledge. But many large cities in<br />

Africa are underperforming, with the potential<br />

of agglomeration economies undercut by poorly<br />

functioning land and property markets, inadequate<br />

mobility options and disconnected and sprawling<br />

urban forms including residential segregation.<br />

The power of agglomeration<br />

economies gives large cities a<br />

major productive advantage.<br />

Firms in cities have better<br />

access to labour, markets,<br />

inputs and knowledge.<br />

CITY COMPETITIVENESS <strong>AND</strong><br />

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT HIT BY<br />

WEAK L<strong>AND</strong> <strong>AND</strong> PROPERTY MARKETS<br />

The poor functioning of land and real estate markets<br />

poses fundamental challenges to cities, undercutting<br />

economies of agglomeration and undermining<br />

basic urban functions. African countries often<br />

score particularly low on the Quality of Land<br />

Administration Index, relative to other regions<br />

(figure 5.4), putting Africa’s cities at a competitive<br />

disadvantage.<br />

Land is a cross-cutting issue for economic<br />

competitiveness: “In all [studied] countries there is<br />

a lack of a clear process for making land available<br />

for development and much of the urbanization and<br />

industrialization that is occurring is happening in the<br />

informal sector” (Roberts, 2014). Poorly functioning<br />

land markets lead to a disconnect between the<br />

productive potential of a city and the cost of land<br />

Figure 5.4 Quality of land administration index, 2016<br />

no data<br />

0 - 5.0<br />

5.1. - 7.0<br />

7.1 10.0<br />

10.1 - 12.0<br />

12.1 - 15.0<br />

15.1 - 18.0<br />

18.1 - 22.0<br />

22.1 - 24.0<br />

25.1 - 30.0<br />

Quality of land administration<br />

0=worst; 30=best<br />

<strong>URBANIZATION</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>INDUSTRIALIZATION</strong> IN PRACTICE<br />

Source: Based on World Bank (2016b).<br />

177

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!