06.03.2018 Views

Seadet-i Ebediyye - Endless Bliss Second Fascicle

Translations of letters from Imam-i Rabbani's Maktubat and Sayyid Abdulhakim Arwasi's books. Subjects include kinds of hadiths, justice, qada, qadar, madhhabs, bid'ats, fiqh, shafa'at, corrupt religions, Islam&Science and various aspects of sufism.

Translations of letters from Imam-i Rabbani's Maktubat and Sayyid Abdulhakim Arwasi's books. Subjects include kinds of hadiths, justice, qada, qadar, madhhabs, bid'ats, fiqh, shafa'at, corrupt religions, Islam&Science and various aspects of sufism.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Sunnî creed. They said that they were ’âsîs (sinners), bâghîs<br />

(rebels) and bid’at-holders. In English, they are called deviants.<br />

People who deny (any one of the) dalîls with one definite [clear]<br />

meaning become disbelievers. An example of this is not to believe<br />

in the annihilation of the universe, or not to believe in the rising of<br />

the dead. Those who say, ‘’Alî is a god’ or ‘the angel Gabriel made<br />

a mistake while bringing the wahy’ become disbelievers, too. For,<br />

these misstatements are not among the meanings deduced through<br />

ijtihâd as a result of misinterpreting the ambiguous dalîls. They are<br />

the consequences of following the nafs. Likewise, a person who<br />

commits the slander called ‘qazf’ [1] against Hadrat ’Âisha or who<br />

denies the fact that her father was a Sahabî becomes a disbeliever.<br />

For, each of these cases involves the denial of a dalîl declared<br />

clearly in the Qur’ân al-kerîm. Not so is the case with blaspheming<br />

against Hadrat Abû Bakr and Hadrat ’Umar or denying their<br />

caliphates; a person who does so will not become a disbeliever if<br />

he can provide a te’wîl (interpretation, explanation). When a<br />

definite and clearly stated harâm is in question, such as attacking<br />

Muslims’ property and lives, a person who employs te’wîl and<br />

asserts that it is halâl will become a disbeliever. He will not<br />

become a disbeliever if the te’wîl he employs is on an ambiguous<br />

dalîl from the Book and Sunnat.”<br />

As is seen, if a person who claims to be a Muslim and observes<br />

the acts of worship, i.e. a person who is said to be an ahl-i-qibla,<br />

holds a belief disagreeable with that of the Ahl as-sunnat and at<br />

the same time contrary to a definite dalîl with a clear meaning,<br />

this belief of his is kufr (disbelief), even if it is deduced by way of<br />

te’wîl. This person is called mulhid. If this belief of his runs<br />

counter to the clear and well-known one of the various meanings<br />

of an unclear and ambiguous dalîl and if he can provide a te’wîl<br />

(explanation, interpretation), his (erroneous) belief is not kufr. It<br />

is a bid’at. If he is unaware of te’wîl and holds that wrong belief<br />

merely in imitation of some heretical scholars or as a result of<br />

yielding to the temptations of his nafs or for obtaining worldly<br />

advantages, that belief is kufr.<br />

Regardless of whether a person is a Sunnite or a holder of<br />

bid’at, if he is ignorant enough to use his faith as an instrument<br />

for worldly advantages, or to sacrifice his faith for obtaining some<br />

worldly means, he is called a yobaz (an impostor in the name of<br />

[1] Please see the third kind of punishments applicable to various sins in<br />

the tenth chapter of the sixth fascicle of <strong>Endless</strong> <strong>Bliss</strong>.<br />

– 267 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!