06.03.2018 Views

Seadet-i Ebediyye - Endless Bliss Second Fascicle

Translations of letters from Imam-i Rabbani's Maktubat and Sayyid Abdulhakim Arwasi's books. Subjects include kinds of hadiths, justice, qada, qadar, madhhabs, bid'ats, fiqh, shafa'at, corrupt religions, Islam&Science and various aspects of sufism.

Translations of letters from Imam-i Rabbani's Maktubat and Sayyid Abdulhakim Arwasi's books. Subjects include kinds of hadiths, justice, qada, qadar, madhhabs, bid'ats, fiqh, shafa'at, corrupt religions, Islam&Science and various aspects of sufism.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

At one place in your letter you write that Shawkânî [1]<br />

has<br />

said: “The tafsîr of Ibni ’Abbâs is not a tafsîr at all.” There is not<br />

a book in the name of the tafsîr of Ibni ’Abbâs. ’Abdullah Ibni<br />

’Abbâs did not write books. Having attended Rasûlullah’s ‘sall-<br />

Allâhu ’alaihi wa sallam’ valuable sohbats, having seen Hadrat<br />

Jabrâîl, and having been known as one of the most deeply<br />

learned of the Sahâba ‘alaihimurridwân’, he expounded upon<br />

some âyats as well as on some hadîths. Making use of his exalted<br />

explanations, our savants of Tafsîr enriched their tafsîrs. Islamic<br />

savants admit with consensus that these tafsîrs are at a very high<br />

level. Shawkânî’s statement needs to be corrected. And<br />

correcting it requires knowing the subtle rules of the knowledge<br />

of usûl-i hadîth, which is very high. However, it is not known<br />

whether or not Shawkânî reached those grades. For, if he had<br />

reached those grades he would not have said anything<br />

incompatible with the methods of great savants.<br />

Concerning the tafsîr of Sa’labî, that is, the tafsîr entitled<br />

Kashf-u bayân, we should keep the abovementioned explanation<br />

in view. So is the case with the Tafsîr-i Wâhidî.<br />

Zemahsharî [2]<br />

belonged to the Mu’tazila group. For this<br />

reason, to understand the divine meanings in the tafsîr of<br />

Kashshâf, the abovementioned explanation, again, should be<br />

kept in consideration. However, because Zemahsharî occupied<br />

the highest grade of the savants of the knowledge of balâghat,<br />

which is an essential factor to prove that the Qur’ân al-kerîm is<br />

mu’jiz, the Sunnî savants of Tafsîr quoted from his tafsîr in<br />

describing the balâghat of the Qur’ân al-kerîm.<br />

As for Qâdî Beydâwî [3]<br />

‘bayyad-Allâhu wajhah’ [may Allâhu<br />

ta’âlâ make his face luminous]; he is exalted enough to deserve his<br />

name and the prayer (attached to his name). He is loved and<br />

honoured above all by mufassirs. He reached the highest grade in<br />

the knowledge of Tafsîr. He was an authority in every branch. He<br />

was a leader in every Madhhab. He was a guide in every thought.<br />

[1] Qâdî Muhammad bin Alî Shawkânî (1173 [1759], Shawkân, San’a -<br />

1250 [1834], San’a, central Yemen).<br />

[2] Allâma Abul-Qâsim Mahmûd Jârullah bin ’Umar, (467 [1074],<br />

Zemahshar, Hâradhm - 538 [1144] Jurjâniyya.) He is said to have<br />

made tawba (for his former heresy) as he was dying.<br />

[3] Qâdî ’Abdullah bin ’Umar ‘rahmatullâhi ’alaih’, (d.685 [1286], Beydâ,<br />

Shîrâz, Iran – Tabrîz.)<br />

– 98 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!