06.03.2018 Views

Seadet-i Ebediyye - Endless Bliss Second Fascicle

Translations of letters from Imam-i Rabbani's Maktubat and Sayyid Abdulhakim Arwasi's books. Subjects include kinds of hadiths, justice, qada, qadar, madhhabs, bid'ats, fiqh, shafa'at, corrupt religions, Islam&Science and various aspects of sufism.

Translations of letters from Imam-i Rabbani's Maktubat and Sayyid Abdulhakim Arwasi's books. Subjects include kinds of hadiths, justice, qada, qadar, madhhabs, bid'ats, fiqh, shafa'at, corrupt religions, Islam&Science and various aspects of sufism.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

that it is fard to perform namâz, to fast, and to pay zakât. On the<br />

other hand, their ijmâ’s that have been reported by one pious<br />

Muslim are like those hadîth-i-sherîfs transmitted through habari-wâhid.<br />

It is wâjib only to act upon them; it is not wâjib to know<br />

[or believe] them. An example of this is to perform four rak’ats of<br />

sunnat namâz before performing the early afternoon prayer.<br />

There are grades of ijmâ’. Clearly stated ijmâ’s of the Ashâb-ikirâm<br />

‘radiy-Allâhu ta’âlâ ’anhum ajma’în’ which have reached us<br />

through the ijmâ’ of each era are as strongly authentic as âyat-ikerîmas<br />

and hadîth-i-sherîfs called mutawâtir. He who denies one<br />

of them becomes a disbeliever. Also, an ijmâ’ on which some of<br />

the Ashâb-i-kirâm were unanimous while the others remained<br />

silent is a definite dalîl; yet a person who denies it does not<br />

become a disbeliever. The ijmâ’ of the third grade involves a rule<br />

on which the Ashâb-i-kirâm did not disagree and on which there<br />

has been unanimity throughout the later centuries. It is identical<br />

with a habar (report) termed mashhûr. Next comes the ijmâ’ of<br />

the later scholars on a matter on which the Ashâb-i-kirâm were<br />

not unanimous; it is similar to a hadîth-i-sherîf reported through a<br />

habar-i-wâhid. It is wâjib to act upon it, yet it is not wâjib to<br />

believe it. When the Muslims of a certain century give various<br />

reports disagreeing with one another on a certain matter, it is bâtil<br />

(invalid) for their successors to reach a conclusion that would not<br />

agree with one of these various disagreeing reports. It is,<br />

therefore, impermissible for them to pronounce judgments<br />

contradictory to (all) those reports.<br />

Qiyâs means to compare something to something else. In (the<br />

Islamic branch of science termed) Fiqh, it means: “When there<br />

cannot be found an Islamic solution to a problem because it<br />

cannot be understood from the Nass (i.e. âyat-i-kerîmas and<br />

hadîth-i-sherîfs with open meanings), to solve it by comparing it<br />

to another similar problem (whose solution is prescribed clearly<br />

in the Nass).” That qiyâs is a dalîl, (i.e. an Islamic source) is a<br />

traditional fact as well as a logical issue. The âyat-i-kerîma which<br />

declares: “O ye who have reason! Take lessons!” purports,<br />

“(Compare and) deduce what you do not know from what you<br />

know!” For the word “i’tibâr”, (the Arabic word used in the âyati-kerîma<br />

and which we rendered into English as “take lessons”),<br />

means “to compare”. When Mu’âz ‘radiy-Allâhu ta’âlâ ’anh’ said<br />

(to Rasûlullah) that he wanted to perform qiyâs when in Yemen -<br />

because he was going to be sent out to Yemen-, the Messenger of<br />

Allah ‘sall-Allâhu ’alaihi wa sallam’ accepted and paid hamd<br />

– 270 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!