06.03.2018 Views

Seadet-i Ebediyye - Endless Bliss Second Fascicle

Translations of letters from Imam-i Rabbani's Maktubat and Sayyid Abdulhakim Arwasi's books. Subjects include kinds of hadiths, justice, qada, qadar, madhhabs, bid'ats, fiqh, shafa'at, corrupt religions, Islam&Science and various aspects of sufism.

Translations of letters from Imam-i Rabbani's Maktubat and Sayyid Abdulhakim Arwasi's books. Subjects include kinds of hadiths, justice, qada, qadar, madhhabs, bid'ats, fiqh, shafa'at, corrupt religions, Islam&Science and various aspects of sufism.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the other hand. There are three groups of Tasawwuf: the first<br />

group are adherent to the Hadîth and Sunnat. The second group<br />

are heretics like the Kurâmiyya. The third group are the followers<br />

of the books of Ikhwan as-safâ and the words of Abu’I-Hayyân.<br />

Ibn al-’Arabî and Ibni Sab’în and the like adopted philosophers’<br />

statements, and turned them into statements of the men of<br />

Tasawwuf. Ibni Sînâ’s book, Âkhir al-ishârat ’alâ maqâmi-l’ârifîn,<br />

contains many such statements. Also, Imâm al-Ghazâlî said such<br />

things in some of his books, such as in his Al-kitâb al-madnûn and<br />

Mishkât al-anwar. In fact, when his friend, Abû Bakr ibn al’Arabî,<br />

warned him that he had taken to philosophy, he tried to save<br />

himself from it, but he could not. On the other hand, Imâm al-<br />

Ghazâlî said that philosophers were disbelievers. Towards the end<br />

of his life he read al-Bukhârî. Some said that this made him give<br />

up the ideas he had written. Others said that those statements<br />

were written for defaming Imâm al-Ghâzâli. There are various<br />

rumours about Imâm al-Ghazâlî in this respect. Muhammad<br />

Mâzarî, a Mâlikî savant educated on the island of Sicily, Turtûshî,<br />

an Andalusian savant, and Ibn al-Jawzî and Ibni ’Uqail and others<br />

said many things.”<br />

The assertions quoted above from Ibni Taymiyya reveals his ill<br />

will about the savants of the Ahl as-sunnat clearly. He cast such<br />

aspersions upon even the greatest ones of the Sahâba. He<br />

stigmatized most of the savants of the Ahl as-sunnat as heretics.<br />

Meanwhile, as he heavily denigrated the great Walî and the qutb<br />

al-’ârifîn Hadrat Abul-Hasan ash-Shâdhilî on account of his books<br />

Hizb al-kebîr and Hizb al-bahr and cast squalid aspersions upon<br />

the great men of Tasawwuf, such as Muhyiddîn Ibn al-’Arabî and<br />

’Umar ibn al-Fârid and Ibni Sab’în and Hallâj Husain ibni Mansûr,<br />

the savants during his time declared unanimously that he was a<br />

sinner and a heretic. In fact, some of them issued a fatwâ stating<br />

that he was a disbeliever. [The profound Islamic savant ’Abd al-<br />

Ghanî an Nablusî gives the names of these superiors of Tasawwuf<br />

in the 363rd and 373rd pages of his book al-Hadîqat an-nadiyya,<br />

says that they are Awliyâ’ and that those who speak negatively<br />

about them are ignorant and unaware.] A letter written to Ibni<br />

Taymiyya in 705 [1305 A.D.] stated: “O my Muslim brother, who<br />

considers himself a great savant and the imâm of his time! I loved<br />

you for Allah’s sake. I disapproved of the savants who were<br />

against you. But hearing your words that are incompatible with my<br />

loving you has consternated me. Does a wise person doubt that the<br />

night begins when the sun sets? You said that you were on the<br />

– 307 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!