06.03.2018 Views

Seadet-i Ebediyye - Endless Bliss Second Fascicle

Translations of letters from Imam-i Rabbani's Maktubat and Sayyid Abdulhakim Arwasi's books. Subjects include kinds of hadiths, justice, qada, qadar, madhhabs, bid'ats, fiqh, shafa'at, corrupt religions, Islam&Science and various aspects of sufism.

Translations of letters from Imam-i Rabbani's Maktubat and Sayyid Abdulhakim Arwasi's books. Subjects include kinds of hadiths, justice, qada, qadar, madhhabs, bid'ats, fiqh, shafa'at, corrupt religions, Islam&Science and various aspects of sufism.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

getting a sealed paper from a lâ-madhhabî, from an enemy of the<br />

Ahl as-sunnat, go back to Pakistan or to India. Youngsters who<br />

see their counterfeit diplomas and hear them speak Arabic think<br />

that they are Islamic savants. But, in fact, they cannot even read a<br />

book of Fiqh. And they know nothing of the teachings of Fiqh in<br />

a book. In fact, they do not believe these Islamic teachings; they<br />

call them bigotry. Of old, Islamic savants looked up the answers<br />

to the inquiries made to them in books of Fiqh, and gave the<br />

inquirers the answers they found. But the la-madhhabî man of<br />

religion being incapable of reading or understanding a book of<br />

Fiqh, will mislead the questioner by saying whatever occurs to his<br />

addled head and defective mind, and will cause them to go to<br />

Hell. It is to this effect that our Prophet ‘sall-Allâhu ’alaihi wa<br />

sallam’ declared: “The good ’âlim is the best of mankind. The bad<br />

’âlim is the worst of mankind.” This hadîth-i-sherîf shows that the<br />

Ahl as-sunnat savants are the best of mankind, and the lâmadhhabîs<br />

are the worst of mankind. For, the former guide<br />

people to following Rasûlullah, i.e., to Paradise, and the latter<br />

lead them to their heretical thoughts, i.e., to Hell.<br />

Ustâd Ibn Khalîfa ’Alîwî, a graduate of the Islamic University<br />

of Jâmî’ al-Azhar, states in his book Aqîdat as-salafi wa-l-khalaf:<br />

“As ’Allama Abû Zuhra writes in his book Târîkh al-madhâhibi-l-<br />

Islâmiyya, some people, who deviated from the Hanbalî Madhhab<br />

called themselves Salafiyyîn. Abu-l-Faraj ibn al-Jawzî and other<br />

savants, who were in the Hanbalî Madhhab too, proclaimed that<br />

those Salafis were not the followers of the Salaf as-sâlihîn, that<br />

they were holders of bid’at, that they belonged to the Mujassima<br />

group: thereby they prevented this fitna from spreading. In the<br />

seventh century Ibni Taymiyya incited this fitna again.” The book<br />

writes the various bid’ats held by the Salafîs and Wahhâbîs and<br />

the aspersions they cast upon the Ahl as-sunnat in detail, and<br />

answers them. The book was printed in Damascus in 1398 A.H.<br />

[1978]. It has 340 pages. Lâ-madhhhabîs call themselves Salafiyya.<br />

They say that Ibni Taymiyya is the greatest imâm of the Salafiyya.<br />

Their assertion is correct in one respect: the word salaf did not<br />

exist before Ibni Taymiyya. The existing word was salaf-i sâlihîn,<br />

and their i’tiqâds were of the Ahl-i sunnat Madhhab. The<br />

heretical ideas of Ibni Taymiyya became a reference source for<br />

Wahhâbîs and other lâ-madhhabîs. Ibni Taymiyya was trained in<br />

the Hanbalî Madhhab. That is, he was Sunnî. But, as he increased<br />

his knowledge and reached the grade of fatwâ, he took to selfsufficiency<br />

and began to assume superiority over the savants of<br />

– 301 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!