06.03.2018 Views

Seadet-i Ebediyye - Endless Bliss Second Fascicle

Translations of letters from Imam-i Rabbani's Maktubat and Sayyid Abdulhakim Arwasi's books. Subjects include kinds of hadiths, justice, qada, qadar, madhhabs, bid'ats, fiqh, shafa'at, corrupt religions, Islam&Science and various aspects of sufism.

Translations of letters from Imam-i Rabbani's Maktubat and Sayyid Abdulhakim Arwasi's books. Subjects include kinds of hadiths, justice, qada, qadar, madhhabs, bid'ats, fiqh, shafa'at, corrupt religions, Islam&Science and various aspects of sufism.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Zoologic, which he published in 1809, Lamarck wrote that the<br />

living could multiply from one origin. But the biologists of the<br />

same century said that the examples given by Lamarck proved<br />

animals’ adaptation to their environments, rather than their<br />

developing from one another.<br />

<strong>Second</strong>ly, Charles Darwin, the son of a British biologist, in his<br />

book The Origin of Species, which he published in 1859, said:<br />

“The living struggle to adapt themselves to their environments.<br />

Those who are successful in this life struggle survive and those<br />

who fail die. The incidental changes in a creature enable it to<br />

survive by adapting itself to the environment.” Other scientists<br />

objected to this in various ways. Even Darwin acknowledged the<br />

fact that he had failed to understand the formation of such<br />

complicated organs as the eye and the brain, and he had to say in<br />

his letter which he wrote to a friend of his: “As I think of the<br />

construction of the eye, I feel as if I will go crazy.”<br />

Thirdly, Hugo de Vries, a botanist from Netherlands, observed<br />

in plants that different plants came out from a pure species<br />

incidentally and that their properties were transferred from one<br />

progeny to the next, and he called this the theory of mutation. But<br />

in point of fact, in mutation new organs do not develop.<br />

Furthermore, it is not possible to explain away the formation of<br />

complicated organs, such as the eye and the brain, which issue<br />

from the various layers of embryo, simply by the changing of<br />

events in the theory of mutation.<br />

Lastly, paleontologists admit the fact that each living species<br />

can change within its own species, and that a living species does<br />

not change into another species. For example, today’s<br />

echinoderms are the same as the ones of the first paleontologic<br />

age. No echinoderm has ever been observed to change into a<br />

vertebrate, nor has any fossil been found to indicate this.<br />

On the contrary, Hadrat Ibrâhim Haqqî has written in his<br />

book Ma’rifatnâma that in the construction of the living there is a<br />

development from the simple to the most perfect man with<br />

examples, and he has explained that this does not mean that the<br />

species change from one to another.<br />

Allâhu ta’âlâ declares: “Observe matter, the changes in<br />

matter; For you did I create them. Utilize all of them.” And also:<br />

“Observe how the young develop and the events of life, see that<br />

all are based upon regular, scientific principles, and thereby<br />

understand My existence and My greatness!”<br />

– 368 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!