13.04.2018 Views

Specifiers Journal 2015-2016

Specifiers Journal 2015-2016

Specifiers Journal 2015-2016

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cost versus Value<br />

There is often a temptation to cut costs when<br />

specifying the level of fire protection in a new<br />

construction project but does this offer value?<br />

Any building design will start with a<br />

client vision from which the architect,<br />

structural engineer and, increasingly,<br />

the fire engineer will need to convert<br />

the client’s aspirations into a practical<br />

and functional design that can be<br />

constructed within the client’s budget.<br />

Long gone are the days when<br />

a designer was shackled by the<br />

constraints of prescriptive fire codes,<br />

leaving today’s fire engineer free to<br />

model alternative solutions that will<br />

satisfy the relevant national building<br />

codes.<br />

So far so good, but there are two<br />

fundamental questions that need to<br />

be considered when addressing a<br />

client’s brief in relation to the required<br />

fire strategy, and these are:<br />

• Is the objective to protect people<br />

from a fire within the building<br />

and allow adequate time to<br />

escape, or<br />

• To protect the building and its<br />

contents from a fire?<br />

In reality the two approaches may<br />

result in very different fire safety<br />

solutions. If protecting the building<br />

itself from fire is not seen as a<br />

concern, then it can be designed to<br />

meet the minimum building codes<br />

required to ensure safe evacuation.<br />

This will result in the protection being<br />

cut to minimum levels, resulting in a<br />

smaller fire protection bill.<br />

But if the whole life of the building is<br />

taken into account, does this actually<br />

offer value? Designing to protect the<br />

building and ensure safe evacuation<br />

may cost a little more at the outset<br />

but could determine whether, post<br />

fire, there is a building/business to<br />

return to at all.<br />

Developing a fire strategy<br />

First and foremost, the client needs to<br />

be clear in terms of how he wishes<br />

his building to perform in a fire. This<br />

requires the building designer to ask a<br />

number of critical questions about key<br />

aspects of the client’s business needs,<br />

since this will impact on the fire<br />

strategy. For example, if the business<br />

is to survive:<br />

• What is the maximum acceptable<br />

damage value?<br />

• Should any fire be contained<br />

within a defined compartment<br />

area?<br />

Any building design will start with a client vision. Credit: Shutterstock/Mmaxer<br />

98 SPECIFICATION JOURNAL <strong>2015</strong>-<strong>2016</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!