Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to ...

(... Continued)
Study or subgroup Treatment Control Odds Ratio Weight Odds Ratio
n/N n/N M-H,Fixed,95% CI M-H,Fixed,95% CI
Total (95% CI) 3488 3574 100.0 % 1.16 [ 1.05, 1.28 ]
Total events: 2145 (Treatment), 2098 (Control)
Heterogeneity: Chi 2 = 28.49, df = 17 (P = 0.04); I 2 =40%
Test for overall effect: Z = 2.96 (P = 0.0031)
Test for subgroup differences: Chi 2 = 9.06, df = 1 (P = 0.00), I 2 =89%
0.2 0.5 1 2 5
Favours control Favours experimental
Analysis 1.3. Comparison 1 CGA versus usual care, Outcome 3 Mortality (up to 6 months).
Review: Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital
Comparison: 1 CGA versus usual care
Outcome: 3 Mortality (up to 6 months)
Study or subgroup Treatment Control Odds Ratio Odds Ratio
1 Ward
n/N n/N M-H,Fixed,95% CI M-H,Fixed,95% CI
Applegate 1990 8/78 16/77 0.44 [ 0.17, 1.09 ]
Asplund 2000 21/190 17/223 1.51 [ 0.77, 2.95 ]
Cohen 2002 GEMC 58/346 52/346 1.14 [ 0.76, 1.71 ]
Cohen 2002 UCOP 46/348 46/348 1.00 [ 0.64, 1.55 ]
Collard 1985 8/218 39/477 0.43 [ 0.20, 0.93 ]
Counsell 2000 173/767 172/764 1.00 [ 0.79, 1.27 ]
Fretwell 1990 47/221 38/215 1.26 [ 0.78, 2.03 ]
Harris 1991 15/97 36/170 0.68 [ 0.35, 1.32 ]
Kay 1992 2/30 0/29 5.18 [ 0.24, 112.57 ]
Landefeld 1995 24/327 24/324 0.99 [ 0.55, 1.78 ]
Rubenstein 1984 9/63 9/60 0.94 [ 0.35, 2.57 ]
Saltvedt 2002 15/127 34/127 0.37 [ 0.19, 0.71 ]
Shamian 1984 1/20 1/16 0.79 [ 0.05, 13.69 ]
Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital (Review)
Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Favours experimental Favours control
(Continued ...)
60