Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

A P P E N D I C E S Appendix 1. MEDLINE search strategy 1 Geriatric Assessment/ 2 Health Services for the Aged/ 3 needs assessment/ 4 risk assessment/ 5 exp Diagnostic Services/ 6 “Health Services Needs and Demand”/ 7 exp Health Services/ 8 exp “Delivery of Health Care”/ 9 exp “Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)”/ 10 or/3-9 11 geriatrics/ 12 10 and 11 13 1 or 2 or 12 14 geriatric assessment.tw. 15 (geriatric adj2 consultation).tw. 16 (geriatric adj2 evaluation).tw. 17 or/13-16 18 randomized controlled trial.pt. 19 controlled clinical trial.pt. 20 intervention studies/ 21 experiment$.tw. 22 (time adj series).tw. 23 (pre test or pretest or (posttest or post test)).tw. 24 random allocation/ 25 impact.tw. 26 intervention?.tw. 27 chang$.tw. 28 evaluation studies/ 29 evaluat$.tw. 30 effect?.tw. 31 comparative studies/ 32 animal/ 33 human/ 34 32 not 33 35 or/18-31 36 35 not 34 37 17 and 36 Appendix 2. EMBASE search strategy 1. geriatric assessment/ 2. health services for the aged/ 3. aged/ or “aged, 80 and over”/ or frail elderly/ or geriatrics/ 4. needs assessment/ 5. *risk assessment/ 6. diagnostic services/ 7. “health services needs and demand”/ 8. *health services/ 9. *health status/ Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital (Review) Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 82
10. *“outcome and process assessment (health care)”/ or *“outcome assessment (health care)”/ 11. “delivery of health care”/ or “delivery of health care, integrated”/ 12. patient care team/ 13. or/4-12 14. 3 and 13 15. ((geriatric or aged or elderly or old age) adj5 (assess$ or evaluation or consultation)).tw. 16. (gemu or gemus).tw. 17. 3 and (multidisciplinary adj5 assess$).tw. 18. 1 or 2 or 14 or 15 or 16 or 17 19. randomized controlled trials/ 20. controlled clinical trials/ 21. random allocation/ 22. double-blind method/ 23. single-blind method/ 24. clinical trials/ 25. (clin$ adj5 trial$).tw. 26. ((singl$ or doubl$ or tripl$ or trebl$) adj5 (blind$ or mask$)).tw. 27. (random$ or quasi-random$ or quasi random$).tw. 28. research design/ 29. meta-analysis/ 30. control groups/ 31. ((control or intervention) adj5 group$).tw. 32. (metaanalysis or meta-analysis or meta-analysis or systematic review).tw. 33. program evaluation/ 34. or/19-33 35. 18 and 34 H I S T O R Y Protocol first published: Issue 4, 2006 Review first published: Issue 7, 2011 Date Event Description 12 November 2008 Amended Minor changes 12 November 2008 Amended Converted to new review format. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital (Review) Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 83
Page 1 and 2:
Comprehensive geriatric assessment
Page 3 and 4:
[Intervention Review] Comprehensive
Page 5 and 6:
A third has evaluated the subgroup
Page 7 and 8:
AARP Ageline (from 1978 to April 20
Page 9 and 10:
Figure 2. Comprehensive geriatric a
Page 11 and 12:
esults are only reported where sign
Page 13 and 14:
Table 1. Cost analysis Cost Analysi
Page 15 and 16:
these subgroups (teams with needs-r
Page 17 and 18:
Again, analysis suggested that wher
Page 19 and 20:
an acute care hospital. Canadian Me
Page 21 and 22:
Liem 1986 {published data only} Lie
Page 23 and 24:
C H A R A C T E R I S T I C S O F S
Page 25 and 26:
Asplund 2000 (Continued) Random seq
Page 27 and 28:
Cohen 2002 GEMC Methods This is the
Page 29 and 30:
Cohen 2002 UCOP (Continued) Selecti
Page 31 and 32:
Counsell 2000 (Continued) Intervent
Page 33 and 34: Fretwell 1990 (Continued) Study pro
Page 35 and 36: Hogan 1987 (Continued) Notes Risk o
Page 37 and 38: Kircher 2007 Methods Year: 2007 Loc
Page 39 and 40: Landefeld 1995 (Continued) Allocati
Page 41 and 42: Naughton 1994 (Continued) Intervent
Page 43 and 44: Nikolaus 1999 plus ESD (Continued)
Page 45 and 46: Powell 1990 (Continued) Random sequ
Page 47 and 48: Rubenstein 1984 Methods Year: 1984
Page 49 and 50: Saltvedt 2002 (Continued) Random se
Page 51 and 52: Thomas 1993 (Continued) Patient sel
Page 53 and 54: White 1994 (Continued) Other bias U
Page 55 and 56: (Continued) Cole 1991 Evaluation of
Page 57 and 58: D A T A A N D A N A L Y S E S Compa
Page 59 and 60: 2.6 Teams (stepdown assessment) Com
Page 61 and 62: Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 CGA vers
Page 63 and 64: (... Continued) Study or subgroup T
Page 65 and 66: (... Continued) Study or subgroup T
Page 71 and 72: Analysis 1.10. Comparison 1 CGA ver
Page 73 and 74: Analysis 1.12. Comparison 1 CGA ver
Page 77 and 78: (... Continued) Study or subgroup F
Page 79 and 80: (... Continued) Study or subgroup E
Page 81 and 82: (... Continued) Study or subgroup E
Page 83: Analysis 4.2. Comparison 4 CGA vers
show all

Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?