MAXIMIZING POSITIVE SYNERGIES - World Health Organization
MAXIMIZING POSITIVE SYNERGIES - World Health Organization
MAXIMIZING POSITIVE SYNERGIES - World Health Organization
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Policy analysis of the impact of<br />
Global <strong>Health</strong> Initiatives on health systems:<br />
Policies and lessons learned from donor programmes*<br />
Anne Rossier Markus, Seble Frehywot, Amie Heap, Alan Greenberg<br />
Abstract<br />
Understanding the broader context under which GHIs operate and the flexibility they grant<br />
countries that apply for funding for health system strengthening (HSS) either separately or as an<br />
integral component of a disease focused plan, is key in understanding the types of synergies that<br />
may take place at the local, regional, and national levels. GHIs express this flexibility in very broad<br />
terms and communicate their flexibility in different ways and often independently from each<br />
other. This broad guidance and variation in communication must be counterbalanced with how<br />
these messages are perceived by countries as well as the need for countries to better understand<br />
in which health system areas they may request funds from individual GHIs. The proper balance<br />
must be found between each GHI’s mission, goals and overarching operating model, and the need<br />
for countries to have increased clarity about funding options and the likelihood of having their<br />
applications met with success. GHIs should strive to achieve this balance “internally” within their<br />
own programmes and “externally” with other GHIs that fund similar, overlapping, and even<br />
distinct activities. This paper summarizes key findings from a systematic review of four GHIs’ laws,<br />
policies and guidance, key informant interviews, and funded country applications for HSS,<br />
particularly in the area of health workforce production, distribution, and retention.<br />
Background<br />
Major GHIs, such as GAVI and the Global Fund, have been developed and implemented over the<br />
past several years to help reduce disease-specific morbidity and mortality in low and middleincome<br />
countries. Core principal policies from donor countries and organizations have guided to a<br />
great extent the trajectory and implementation of GHI funds at the host country level. Specifically,<br />
these policies may influence how GHI funds can or cannot be used to strengthen different<br />
elements of the health system as defined by WHO, namely health workforce, health information,<br />
service delivery, governance and leadership, health financing, and medical products and<br />
technologies. Concurrently, an increasing number of host countries have developed policies at the<br />
national and local levels to address the different elements of their health systems, the specific<br />
needs of their countries as they relate to varying disease burdens, and the three health-related<br />
Millennium Development Goals. Despite general guidance from GHIs of how and when countries<br />
can use GHI funds for HSS, these policies have been interpreted differently by various host<br />
countries and implementing partners. Therefore, to maximize potential synergies between GHI<br />
funding and health systems, it is important to improve our understanding of these guiding GHI<br />
policies, and how they are viewed and interpreted at the host country level.<br />
218