16.12.2012 Views

MAXIMIZING POSITIVE SYNERGIES - World Health Organization

MAXIMIZING POSITIVE SYNERGIES - World Health Organization

MAXIMIZING POSITIVE SYNERGIES - World Health Organization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Policy analysis of the impact of<br />

Global <strong>Health</strong> Initiatives on health systems:<br />

Policies and lessons learned from donor programmes*<br />

Anne Rossier Markus, Seble Frehywot, Amie Heap, Alan Greenberg<br />

Abstract<br />

Understanding the broader context under which GHIs operate and the flexibility they grant<br />

countries that apply for funding for health system strengthening (HSS) either separately or as an<br />

integral component of a disease focused plan, is key in understanding the types of synergies that<br />

may take place at the local, regional, and national levels. GHIs express this flexibility in very broad<br />

terms and communicate their flexibility in different ways and often independently from each<br />

other. This broad guidance and variation in communication must be counterbalanced with how<br />

these messages are perceived by countries as well as the need for countries to better understand<br />

in which health system areas they may request funds from individual GHIs. The proper balance<br />

must be found between each GHI’s mission, goals and overarching operating model, and the need<br />

for countries to have increased clarity about funding options and the likelihood of having their<br />

applications met with success. GHIs should strive to achieve this balance “internally” within their<br />

own programmes and “externally” with other GHIs that fund similar, overlapping, and even<br />

distinct activities. This paper summarizes key findings from a systematic review of four GHIs’ laws,<br />

policies and guidance, key informant interviews, and funded country applications for HSS,<br />

particularly in the area of health workforce production, distribution, and retention.<br />

Background<br />

Major GHIs, such as GAVI and the Global Fund, have been developed and implemented over the<br />

past several years to help reduce disease-specific morbidity and mortality in low and middleincome<br />

countries. Core principal policies from donor countries and organizations have guided to a<br />

great extent the trajectory and implementation of GHI funds at the host country level. Specifically,<br />

these policies may influence how GHI funds can or cannot be used to strengthen different<br />

elements of the health system as defined by WHO, namely health workforce, health information,<br />

service delivery, governance and leadership, health financing, and medical products and<br />

technologies. Concurrently, an increasing number of host countries have developed policies at the<br />

national and local levels to address the different elements of their health systems, the specific<br />

needs of their countries as they relate to varying disease burdens, and the three health-related<br />

Millennium Development Goals. Despite general guidance from GHIs of how and when countries<br />

can use GHI funds for HSS, these policies have been interpreted differently by various host<br />

countries and implementing partners. Therefore, to maximize potential synergies between GHI<br />

funding and health systems, it is important to improve our understanding of these guiding GHI<br />

policies, and how they are viewed and interpreted at the host country level.<br />

218

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!