MAXIMIZING POSITIVE SYNERGIES - World Health Organization
MAXIMIZING POSITIVE SYNERGIES - World Health Organization
MAXIMIZING POSITIVE SYNERGIES - World Health Organization
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Specific sub-research questions pursued by MPS research partners included the following:<br />
• How are major GHIs interacting with health systems at national and sub-national levels?<br />
How are these interactions affecting the main components or “building blocks” of<br />
countries’ health systems?<br />
• How are they influencing processes such as scale-up of services; coordination of services;<br />
and harmonization of donor priorities and activities?<br />
• In selected local settings, is GHI support translating into impacts at the facility level? What<br />
initial lessons emerge for improving policy and service delivery?<br />
• Are the major GHIs interacting with health systems in similar ways, or can significant<br />
differences among them be observed?<br />
• How are major GHIs engaging civil society and communities? What is the role of civil<br />
society and community organizations in strengthening synergies between GHIs and health<br />
systems?<br />
What specific areas of interplay between GHIs and health systems appear to be most<br />
critical/strategic in accelerating action to improve health outcomes?<br />
In formulating their research strategies and analyzing results, MPS researchers have adopted a<br />
conceptual framework informed by WHO’s “building blocks” approach to health systems<br />
strengthening. In an ongoing effort to clarify the problems, needs, expected outcomes, and key<br />
variables in health systems performance, the WHO building blocks stress common elements that<br />
recur in every health system and must work in concert if services are to be delivered effectively. In<br />
their original formulation the building blocks included service delivery; health workforce;<br />
information; medical products, vaccines and technologies; financing; and stewardship—meaning<br />
leadership, governance and the fulfilment by officials and other professionals of their<br />
responsibilities as guardians of the right to health [11]. To this list of fundamental systems<br />
components, MPS researchers have added community and civil society participation as a further<br />
critical dimension of health action.<br />
In an iterative process, MPS researchers elaborated the WHO building blocks into a conceptual<br />
framework that recognizes how the functioning of the building blocks is impacted by contextual<br />
factors [5-7], as well as how systems components interact with and “feed back” upon each other<br />
(Fig. 1). This framework reflects an emerging approach to health systems research in which the<br />
focus has shifted from evaluating the efficacy and cost-efficiency of isolated biomedical<br />
interventions to understanding how complex systems function to yield optimal health results. MPS<br />
researchers readily acknowledge the incompleteness of the framework and its provisional<br />
character. The framework has provided a fresh “way in” to the description and analysis of GHIhealth<br />
systems interactions at country level, not a definitive answer. Nonetheless, the framework<br />
has proved its value as a tool for shaping fruitful research questions and organizing results to<br />
facilitate practical learning for policy and implementation.<br />
3