16.12.2012 Views

MAXIMIZING POSITIVE SYNERGIES - World Health Organization

MAXIMIZING POSITIVE SYNERGIES - World Health Organization

MAXIMIZING POSITIVE SYNERGIES - World Health Organization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Specific sub-research questions pursued by MPS research partners included the following:<br />

• How are major GHIs interacting with health systems at national and sub-national levels?<br />

How are these interactions affecting the main components or “building blocks” of<br />

countries’ health systems?<br />

• How are they influencing processes such as scale-up of services; coordination of services;<br />

and harmonization of donor priorities and activities?<br />

• In selected local settings, is GHI support translating into impacts at the facility level? What<br />

initial lessons emerge for improving policy and service delivery?<br />

• Are the major GHIs interacting with health systems in similar ways, or can significant<br />

differences among them be observed?<br />

• How are major GHIs engaging civil society and communities? What is the role of civil<br />

society and community organizations in strengthening synergies between GHIs and health<br />

systems?<br />

What specific areas of interplay between GHIs and health systems appear to be most<br />

critical/strategic in accelerating action to improve health outcomes?<br />

In formulating their research strategies and analyzing results, MPS researchers have adopted a<br />

conceptual framework informed by WHO’s “building blocks” approach to health systems<br />

strengthening. In an ongoing effort to clarify the problems, needs, expected outcomes, and key<br />

variables in health systems performance, the WHO building blocks stress common elements that<br />

recur in every health system and must work in concert if services are to be delivered effectively. In<br />

their original formulation the building blocks included service delivery; health workforce;<br />

information; medical products, vaccines and technologies; financing; and stewardship—meaning<br />

leadership, governance and the fulfilment by officials and other professionals of their<br />

responsibilities as guardians of the right to health [11]. To this list of fundamental systems<br />

components, MPS researchers have added community and civil society participation as a further<br />

critical dimension of health action.<br />

In an iterative process, MPS researchers elaborated the WHO building blocks into a conceptual<br />

framework that recognizes how the functioning of the building blocks is impacted by contextual<br />

factors [5-7], as well as how systems components interact with and “feed back” upon each other<br />

(Fig. 1). This framework reflects an emerging approach to health systems research in which the<br />

focus has shifted from evaluating the efficacy and cost-efficiency of isolated biomedical<br />

interventions to understanding how complex systems function to yield optimal health results. MPS<br />

researchers readily acknowledge the incompleteness of the framework and its provisional<br />

character. The framework has provided a fresh “way in” to the description and analysis of GHIhealth<br />

systems interactions at country level, not a definitive answer. Nonetheless, the framework<br />

has proved its value as a tool for shaping fruitful research questions and organizing results to<br />

facilitate practical learning for policy and implementation.<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!