MAXIMIZING POSITIVE SYNERGIES - World Health Organization
MAXIMIZING POSITIVE SYNERGIES - World Health Organization
MAXIMIZING POSITIVE SYNERGIES - World Health Organization
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ased on WHO recommendations for scaling-up ART in resource-limited settings [11, 12]. This<br />
approach allows ART initiation even when CD4 count is not available, using total lymphocytes<br />
count and clinical stage of the disease.<br />
Public subsidies were also devoted to ARV drugs, leading to a progressive reduction in out-ofpocket<br />
payments by HIV-infected patients at the point of delivery, until the achievement of free<br />
access to ART for all eligible patients in May 2007. Foreign aid, in particular from the Global Fund<br />
contributes substantially to the financing of the national programme for access to ART.<br />
In June 2008, 53 238 persons living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) – 58% of the estimated number of the<br />
Cameroonians requiring ART according to the National AIDS Control Committee (See Table 1) –<br />
were receiving treatment. This figure constitutes a significant scale-up from the 600 Cameroonians<br />
on ART in 2001, and gives the country one of the highest rates of ART coverage in the world.<br />
In 2006, the Ministry of Public <strong>Health</strong> of Cameroon requested an evaluation of the national ART<br />
programme.<br />
Researchers from the Universities of Yaoundé and the French Agency for AIDS Research (ANRS)<br />
jointly carried out the evaluation which aimed to assess the programme’s performance according<br />
to the level of HIV-care delivery in the following main areas: (i) early entry to care for HIV patients<br />
and quality of care for ART treated patients, (ii) financial accessibility of HIV-services and equity in<br />
access to treatment, (iii) prevention behaviours.<br />
The evaluation was based on cross-validation of quantitative and qualitative surveys aimed at<br />
collecting original data from patients, health care professionals and public health decision makers.<br />
These data were compared with secondary analysis of existing sources (reports from the Ministry<br />
of Public <strong>Health</strong>, National AIDS Control Committee (NACC), National Centre for the Supply of<br />
Essential Drugs and Medical Consumables (CENAME), UN and bilateral organizations, the Global<br />
Fund etc.).<br />
A national, cross-sectional survey was conducted in Cameroon from September 2006 to March<br />
2007. Participants were recruited in 27 hospitals delivering HIV care (eight “central” Accredited<br />
Treatment Centres (ATCs) of the two main cities, six ATCs in the provincial capitals and 13 district<br />
managing units (MUs) located in six provinces around the country. Those eligible to participate in<br />
the survey were aged 21 years or older and had been diagnosed as HIV-positive for at least three<br />
months. Participation was proposed to eligible patients who came for a consultation during the<br />
survey period, according to a random selection procedure. At the time of the survey, ARV drugs<br />
were not free; they were delivered to patients at the price of 3000 CFA (Communaute Financiere<br />
Africaine) Francs, or about 6 United States dollars (US$), for Triomune, and 7000 CFA francs, or<br />
about US$ 14, for other treatments (at US$ 1 = 492.6 FCFA).<br />
Among the 3488 patients approached, 3170 (91%) agreed to participate in the survey, and 99% of<br />
those patients filled out the questionnaire, leading to a total sample of 3151 respondents (global<br />
response rate = 90%).<br />
Quality of care according to the level of health care delivery was assessed in the subsample of<br />
patients who had been ART-treated for at least six months by using four main criteria: (1) average<br />
monthly gain in CD4 cells/mm 3 since initiation of treatment; (2) adherence to ART 6 ; (3) occurrence<br />
6 Adherence to ART was measured using a validated list of questions concerning dose taking during the previous four<br />
days, as well as with respect to the time schedule and occurrence of treatment interruptions during the previous four<br />
weeks. These data enabled us to compute two scores for adherence, concerning the previous four days and the previous<br />
four weeks, often used in previous cohort studies.<br />
23