The Spaces Between Grassroots Documentary ... - Ezra Winton
The Spaces Between Grassroots Documentary ... - Ezra Winton
The Spaces Between Grassroots Documentary ... - Ezra Winton
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Zimmermann is interested in the piercing potential of the apex, and sets the tone<br />
for documentary as a combative force in the following passage from her aforementioned<br />
book: “Documentaries repudiate the fictions of the nation with the real, the document, the<br />
historical, the particular, and it is these negations and refusals that provoke the offensives<br />
to close down all public cultures.” (2000, p.15) And while her argumentation tends<br />
toward the type of binaries that Mouffe seeks to overcome, Zimmermann invigorates the<br />
documentary genre by treating it as a force with which to combat cultural hegemony,<br />
either as the films themselves, or in the case of this inquiry, as practices around<br />
dissemination and public viewing.<br />
While her metaphorical and bombastic language may be difficult for the so-called<br />
non-converted to accept, there is a war of sorts that exists over the public spaces in<br />
advanced capitalist societies. She writes: “It is a war about whether public spaces will<br />
exist; whether they will be zones of fantasy projections for the transnationals, or zones of<br />
contestation, insurgency, and community with access to the means of production and<br />
distribution.” (Ibid, p. 14) Zimmermann offers two alternatives, but in this inquiry I argue<br />
that there are in fact multiple, overlapping, interlocking positions in the “war.” Three<br />
have been identified by Rodriguez and company, and are used to complicate<br />
Zimmermann’s notion of the battleground. That said, she is describing an insurrection<br />
over public space, and in fact, the act of creating counterpublics and counter-hegemonies.<br />
Following this, Zimmermann does at times harmonize with Mouffe, as in the following<br />
passage, pitting homogenous liberalism against heterogeneous collectivism (community):<br />
This is a war over a discursive territory, a war over how the public spaces<br />
of the nation are defined and mapped, a war between the faux<br />
homogeneity of corporatist multiculturalism that absorbs and vaporizes<br />
difference and a radical heterogeneity that positions difference(s) and<br />
54