21.12.2012 Views

Legal empowerment for local resource control

Legal empowerment for local resource control

Legal empowerment for local resource control

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8<br />

<strong>local</strong> levels. Overall, the law tends to accord greater protection to some<br />

interests (<strong>for</strong>eign investment) than to others (<strong>local</strong> <strong>resource</strong> users). These<br />

asymmetries in the law broadly reflect power asymmetries between <strong>for</strong>eign<br />

investors, <strong>local</strong> <strong>resource</strong> users, the host state and other actors involved in or<br />

affected by the investment project.<br />

Secondly, the study analyses the legal tools that have been used in several<br />

African countries to secure the <strong>resource</strong> rights of <strong>local</strong> groups affected by<br />

<strong>for</strong>eign investment projects, and to address power asymmetries between<br />

<strong>local</strong> <strong>resource</strong> users and <strong>for</strong>eign investors (Part III). This includes vesting<br />

greater <strong>resource</strong> rights with <strong>local</strong> groups (e.g. through community land<br />

registration or decentralisation); tightening requirements <strong>for</strong> minimising<br />

and compensating negative impacts on <strong>local</strong> <strong>resource</strong> rights (e.g. through<br />

more demanding rules on compensation <strong>for</strong> taking or damage to property);<br />

and strengthening <strong>local</strong> consultation and benefit-sharing requirements.<br />

The conclusion (Part IV) analyses the way and extent to which these legal<br />

tools can tackle the asymmetries both in power and in the law identified<br />

above; and outlines ways <strong>for</strong> taking <strong>for</strong>ward the key findings of this study.<br />

The study was prepared <strong>for</strong> the “<strong>Legal</strong> tools <strong>for</strong> community <strong>empowerment</strong>”<br />

project – a collaborative project to empower <strong>local</strong> <strong>resource</strong> users affected by<br />

investment projects in Africa (see Box 1). During the scoping phase of that<br />

project, research was undertaken to identify innovative approaches <strong>for</strong><br />

securing <strong>local</strong> <strong>resource</strong> rights, and to assess the extent to which procedural<br />

rights (e.g. access to in<strong>for</strong>mation, public participation in decision-making)<br />

can enable <strong>local</strong> <strong>resource</strong> users to have greater say in decision-making. The<br />

research aimed to develop a coherent conceptual framework <strong>for</strong> project<br />

activities, and to take stock of experience with using legal processes as a<br />

means <strong>for</strong> <strong>empowerment</strong>. It was to pave the way to the in-country work of<br />

the “<strong>Legal</strong> tools” project, and to generate knowledge <strong>for</strong> wider<br />

dissemination. This publication summarises key findings of the research on<br />

securing <strong>local</strong> <strong>resource</strong> rights (the findings of the research on procedural<br />

rights are summarised in a separate report).<br />

The study is likely to be of interest to development lawyers, development<br />

practitioners working at a macro-planning level, and researchers. As <strong>for</strong><br />

development practitioners, the study sets out the case <strong>for</strong> taking law<br />

seriously as a tool <strong>for</strong> <strong>empowerment</strong> and positive change. As <strong>for</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!