Legal empowerment for local resource control
Legal empowerment for local resource control
Legal empowerment for local resource control
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
state, <strong>local</strong> <strong>resource</strong> users can “make representations” to the Land<br />
Commissioner (section 4(5) of the Village Land Act 1999). In Mozambique,<br />
both the Land Act 1997 and the Forest Act 1999 provide <strong>for</strong> mandatory<br />
community consultation processes be<strong>for</strong>e investors are allocated land use<br />
rights (“DUAT”) and <strong>for</strong>est concessions (articles 13 and 24 of the Land Act,<br />
and article 17 of the Forest Act). While under the Forest Act the mandatory<br />
consultation process only applies to <strong>for</strong>est concessions, the implementing<br />
regulations adopted under the Act extend consultation requirements to the<br />
issuance of <strong>for</strong>est permits.<br />
In Ghana, while there is no general legal requirement <strong>for</strong> investors to consult<br />
<strong>local</strong> <strong>resource</strong> users, the Timber Resources Management Act 1997 requires<br />
the “authorization” of the “individual, group or owner concerned” <strong>for</strong> the<br />
issuance of Timber Utilisation Contracts in land areas that are already in use.<br />
Local consultation procedures raise a range of legal issues and differ widely<br />
in the way they tackle them. The sections below explore these issues.<br />
Who is consulted?<br />
The first element of any mandatory consultation process is clarifying who is<br />
to be consulted. All too often, consultation processes only concern a<br />
restricted number of people, usually <strong>local</strong> elites who may act to their own<br />
advantage and to the detriment of other <strong>local</strong> stakeholders. <strong>Legal</strong><br />
requirements on who is to be consulted vary substantially across countries,<br />
<strong>for</strong> instance depending on whether consultation is limited to land “owners”<br />
and holders of other legally registered land rights, or whether it is extended<br />
to all <strong>resource</strong> users.<br />
In Ghana, the consent requirement <strong>for</strong> the issuance of timber utilisation<br />
contracts in land areas currently in use refers to the “individual, group or<br />
owner concerned”, suggesting that it applies to holders of rights not<br />
amounting to full ownership (section 4 of the Timber Resources Management<br />
Act). In Mozambique, all land is owned by the state; <strong>local</strong>s and <strong>for</strong>eigners<br />
alike enjoy use rights on state-owned land. Here, <strong>local</strong> consultation of <strong>local</strong><br />
holders of use rights is mandatory irrespective of whether such rights have<br />
been registered or not (articles 13(2) and 14(2) of the Land Act).<br />
Generally, restricting consultation requirements to owners or other<br />
registered right holders alone substantially limits the applicability of this<br />
75