Legal empowerment for local resource control
Legal empowerment for local resource control
Legal empowerment for local resource control
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Another aspect of “who to consult” concerns whether mandatory<br />
consultation requirements relate to individuals, to groups or to both. Under<br />
Ghana’s Timber Resources Management Act, both seem possible. In<br />
Mozambique, on the other hand, consultation requirements are established<br />
with specific regard to “<strong>local</strong> communities” (on which see above, chapter<br />
3.1).<br />
Where consultations are held with groups (“communities”), there is a need<br />
to clarify who represents the community in consultation exercises<br />
(particularly given the large size of many communities – see above, chapter<br />
3.1); and which accountability mechanisms can be established between the<br />
representatives and the represented. Evidence from Mozambique suggests<br />
that, in many cases, consultation processes <strong>for</strong> the allocation of land rights<br />
and/or <strong>for</strong>est rights to investors only involve few community members,<br />
usually customary chiefs and <strong>local</strong> elites; that women are rarely involved;<br />
and that there is little internal discussion between community<br />
representatives and their constituents (Norfolk, 2004; Durang and Tanner,<br />
2004; Tanner and Baleira, 2006).<br />
Object and scope of the consultation<br />
Another key variable of mandatory consultation processes concerns their<br />
object and scope. What are <strong>local</strong> <strong>resource</strong> users consulted about? Is the<br />
object of consultation the very desirability of the investment project in the<br />
land area they use, or the terms and conditions of such project? Or is it the<br />
more specific issue of its impact on <strong>local</strong> <strong>resource</strong> rights (the other more<br />
fundamental issues being reserved to determination by the central<br />
government without much consultation)?<br />
The last scenario is the most common one: even where consultation is<br />
legally required, its scope is limited to obtaining the consent of <strong>local</strong><br />
<strong>resource</strong> users <strong>for</strong> granting <strong>resource</strong> rights within their land area to the<br />
investor. For <strong>local</strong> <strong>resource</strong> users, the most that can come out of it is (not a<br />
reshaping of key decisions concerning the investment project but) some<br />
degree of benefit sharing. This is the case in Ghana and Mozambique.<br />
In Mozambique, the consultation process is conceived slightly differently <strong>for</strong><br />
land and <strong>for</strong>est rights. In the case of land rights, community consultation is<br />
required be<strong>for</strong>e land use rights are allocated to investors; the specific object<br />
of this consultation concerns ascertaining that the land area is “free” and<br />
77