21.12.2012 Views

Legal empowerment for local resource control

Legal empowerment for local resource control

Legal empowerment for local resource control

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Another aspect of “who to consult” concerns whether mandatory<br />

consultation requirements relate to individuals, to groups or to both. Under<br />

Ghana’s Timber Resources Management Act, both seem possible. In<br />

Mozambique, on the other hand, consultation requirements are established<br />

with specific regard to “<strong>local</strong> communities” (on which see above, chapter<br />

3.1).<br />

Where consultations are held with groups (“communities”), there is a need<br />

to clarify who represents the community in consultation exercises<br />

(particularly given the large size of many communities – see above, chapter<br />

3.1); and which accountability mechanisms can be established between the<br />

representatives and the represented. Evidence from Mozambique suggests<br />

that, in many cases, consultation processes <strong>for</strong> the allocation of land rights<br />

and/or <strong>for</strong>est rights to investors only involve few community members,<br />

usually customary chiefs and <strong>local</strong> elites; that women are rarely involved;<br />

and that there is little internal discussion between community<br />

representatives and their constituents (Norfolk, 2004; Durang and Tanner,<br />

2004; Tanner and Baleira, 2006).<br />

Object and scope of the consultation<br />

Another key variable of mandatory consultation processes concerns their<br />

object and scope. What are <strong>local</strong> <strong>resource</strong> users consulted about? Is the<br />

object of consultation the very desirability of the investment project in the<br />

land area they use, or the terms and conditions of such project? Or is it the<br />

more specific issue of its impact on <strong>local</strong> <strong>resource</strong> rights (the other more<br />

fundamental issues being reserved to determination by the central<br />

government without much consultation)?<br />

The last scenario is the most common one: even where consultation is<br />

legally required, its scope is limited to obtaining the consent of <strong>local</strong><br />

<strong>resource</strong> users <strong>for</strong> granting <strong>resource</strong> rights within their land area to the<br />

investor. For <strong>local</strong> <strong>resource</strong> users, the most that can come out of it is (not a<br />

reshaping of key decisions concerning the investment project but) some<br />

degree of benefit sharing. This is the case in Ghana and Mozambique.<br />

In Mozambique, the consultation process is conceived slightly differently <strong>for</strong><br />

land and <strong>for</strong>est rights. In the case of land rights, community consultation is<br />

required be<strong>for</strong>e land use rights are allocated to investors; the specific object<br />

of this consultation concerns ascertaining that the land area is “free” and<br />

77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!