21.12.2012 Views

Legal empowerment for local resource control

Legal empowerment for local resource control

Legal empowerment for local resource control

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10<br />

1.2. DEFINITIONS, SCOPE AND RATIONALE<br />

<strong>Legal</strong> <strong>empowerment</strong> is defined here as “the use of legal services and other<br />

development activities to increase disadvantaged populations’ <strong>control</strong> over<br />

their lives” (Golub, 2005:304). The concept has recently gained currency<br />

partly as a result of the establishment of the UN-hosted Commission on the<br />

<strong>Legal</strong> Empowerment of the Poor. Different people have used this concept in<br />

different ways, however. The meaning of legal <strong>empowerment</strong> as used in<br />

this study is further discussed below (section 2.1).<br />

This study focuses on one area of legal <strong>empowerment</strong> – on using legal<br />

processes to increase <strong>local</strong> users’ <strong>control</strong> over the <strong>resource</strong>s on which they<br />

depend, particularly land but also subsoil and surface <strong>resource</strong>s. This focus<br />

reflects the importance of access to land and natural <strong>resource</strong>s <strong>for</strong> the<br />

livelihoods of much of the rural population in sub-Saharan Africa.<br />

Increasing <strong>local</strong> <strong>resource</strong> <strong>control</strong> entails improving security of <strong>resource</strong><br />

rights and strengthening leverage in decision-making affecting those rights.<br />

Security of rights refers to the extent to which <strong>resource</strong> users can be<br />

confident that they will not be arbitrarily deprived of their <strong>resource</strong> rights<br />

and/or the benefits deriving from these. This confidence includes both<br />

objective elements (nature, content, clarity, duration and en<strong>for</strong>ceability of<br />

rights) and subjective elements (the <strong>resource</strong> users’ perception of the<br />

security of their rights). Leverage in decision-making refers to the extent to<br />

which <strong>resource</strong> users can influence decision-making processes that affect<br />

their <strong>resource</strong> rights – ranging from no say to consultation through to veto<br />

power.<br />

The study analyses the legal and para-legal tools that can be used to<br />

increase <strong>local</strong> <strong>resource</strong> <strong>control</strong>. <strong>Legal</strong> tools are institutional arrangements<br />

that are designed to respond to specific needs or problems (hence “tools”),<br />

and that draw legitimacy from their being anchored to the legal system (e.g.<br />

legislation or case law; hence “legal”). Relevant tools examined here include<br />

<strong>for</strong> instance community land registration, mandatory community<br />

consultation, negotiated benefit-sharing agreements, social impact<br />

assessment, compensation <strong>for</strong> takings and remedies <strong>for</strong> damage to property<br />

(injunctions, restoration and compensation). Para-legal tools are materials<br />

and activities to build <strong>local</strong> capacity in order to enable poorer and more<br />

marginalised groups to use those legal tools more effectively; and, more

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!