21.12.2012 Views

Legal empowerment for local resource control

Legal empowerment for local resource control

Legal empowerment for local resource control

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

76<br />

requirement in much of rural Africa. This is because registered private<br />

ownership of rural land is rare in much of the continent (see above, chapter<br />

2.3). Extending consultation requirements to a wider range of <strong>resource</strong> right<br />

holders is there<strong>for</strong>e crucial <strong>for</strong> the relevance and usefulness of mandatory<br />

consultation processes. In this sense, legal re<strong>for</strong>m to secure <strong>local</strong> <strong>resource</strong><br />

rights may include not only introducing new consultation requirements, but<br />

also extending existing requirements to a wider range of <strong>resource</strong> users.<br />

Among <strong>resource</strong> rights not amounting to ownership and/or not legally<br />

registered, further differences of treatment may exist between different<br />

types of <strong>resource</strong> users – <strong>for</strong> instance between farmers and herders. This<br />

may reflect entrenched government perceptions about the economic<br />

contribution of different <strong>for</strong>ms of <strong>resource</strong> use. In this contest, pastoralism<br />

has often not been considered as a <strong>for</strong>m of productive <strong>resource</strong> use<br />

deserving legal protection – although the “pastoral” legislation recently<br />

adopted by some Sahelian countries has started to recognise pastoralism as<br />

meeting “mise en valeur” requirements (e.g. Mali’s Pastoral Charter 2001 –<br />

see above, section 3.1.3).<br />

In addition, under customary <strong>resource</strong> tenure systems, pastoralists tend to<br />

hold rights that differ from those of farmers, and that focus on flexible<br />

arrangements enabling herb mobility and periodic access to strategic<br />

<strong>resource</strong>s such as water and dry-season grazing (rather than on permanent<br />

exclusive rights over clearly delimited lands). While these <strong>resource</strong> rights are<br />

not less worthy than those held by farming groups, their lack of exclusivity<br />

makes them more vulnerable to encroachment.<br />

This legal vulnerability of pastoral rights may also be reflected in<br />

consultation requirements. In Ghana, <strong>for</strong> instance, while the Timber<br />

Resources Management Act requires <strong>local</strong> consent <strong>for</strong> farmed land and <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>for</strong>est plantations, it is silent on grazing lands.<br />

As a result of these differences in treatment, much pastoral land in many<br />

parts of Africa has been converted to other <strong>for</strong>ms of <strong>resource</strong> use, usually<br />

with the explicit or implicit backing of the government – including within<br />

the context of <strong>for</strong>eign investment projects. Again, legal re<strong>for</strong>m extending<br />

the application of consultation processes to all <strong>local</strong> <strong>resource</strong> users,<br />

including pastoralists, would help secure their <strong>resource</strong> rights.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!