22.12.2012 Views

Final report for WP4.3: Enhancement of design methods ... - Upwind

Final report for WP4.3: Enhancement of design methods ... - Upwind

Final report for WP4.3: Enhancement of design methods ... - Upwind

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

UPWIND WP4: Offshore Support Structures and Foundations<br />

The comparisons <strong>of</strong> first and second-order unrestrained motions in surge, heave and pitch <strong>for</strong> the OC3-Hywind<br />

<strong>for</strong> a Pierson-Moskowitz spectrum with Hs=0.5m are shown Figure 8.16. For this spectrum, the unrestrained<br />

motions are very small. However it should be pointed out the relative importance <strong>of</strong> the second-order components<br />

<strong>of</strong> the motion.<br />

unrestrained motion (surge) [m]<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

-0.5<br />

x 10-3<br />

1<br />

-1<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25<br />

Time [s]<br />

unrestrained motion (heave) [m]<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

-0.5<br />

x 10-3<br />

1<br />

-1<br />

-1.5<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25<br />

Time [s]<br />

107<br />

unrestrained motion (pitch) [deg]<br />

0.015<br />

0.01<br />

0.005<br />

0<br />

-0.005<br />

-0.01<br />

-0.015<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25<br />

Time [s]<br />

Figure 8.16: Comparisons between first and second-order unrestrained motions in surge, heave and pitch modes <strong>for</strong> the<br />

OC3-Hywind <strong>for</strong> a Pierson-Moskowitz spectrum with Hs=0.5 m (Tp=3.54 s).<br />

Pierson-Moskowitz spectrum with Hs=2.5 m<br />

The first and second-order excitation <strong>for</strong>ces in surge, heave and pitch modes <strong>for</strong> the OC3-Hywind associated<br />

with the Pierson-Moskowitz spectrum with Hs=2.5m (Tp=7.9s) are shown in Figure 8.17. As in the previous<br />

case (Hs=0.5m) the influence <strong>of</strong> the second-order components is more important in surge and pitch modes.<br />

The presence <strong>of</strong> higher frequency components in surge and pitch are due to the predominance <strong>of</strong> the sumfrequency<br />

<strong>for</strong>ce QTFs <strong>for</strong> these modes.<br />

Excitation Force in surge [MN]<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

-0.5<br />

-1<br />

-1.5<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50<br />

Time [s]<br />

Excitation Force in heave [MN]<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

-0.1<br />

-0.2<br />

-0.3<br />

-0.4<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50<br />

Time [s]<br />

Excitation Force (pitch) [MN.m]<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

-50<br />

-100<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50<br />

Time [s]<br />

Figure 8.17: First and second-order excitation <strong>for</strong>ces in surge, heave and pitch modes <strong>of</strong> the OC3-Hywind <strong>for</strong> a Pierson-<br />

Moskowitz spectrum with Hs=2.5 m (Tp = 7.9 s).<br />

The comparisons <strong>of</strong> first and second-order unrestrained motions in surge, heave and pitch <strong>for</strong> the OC3-Hywind<br />

<strong>for</strong> a Pierson Moskowitz spectrum with Hs=2.5 m (Tp=7.9 s) are shown in Figure 8.18. The unrestrained motions<br />

<strong>of</strong> this structure are very small. The second-order component is dominant in surge, in heave has very little importance<br />

and in pitch is <strong>of</strong> the same importance as the first-order component.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!