Final report for WP4.3: Enhancement of design methods ... - Upwind
Final report for WP4.3: Enhancement of design methods ... - Upwind
Final report for WP4.3: Enhancement of design methods ... - Upwind
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
UPWIND WP4: Offshore Support Structures and Foundations<br />
The comparisons <strong>of</strong> first and second-order unrestrained motions in surge, heave and pitch <strong>for</strong> the OC3-Hywind<br />
<strong>for</strong> a Pierson-Moskowitz spectrum with Hs=0.5m are shown Figure 8.16. For this spectrum, the unrestrained<br />
motions are very small. However it should be pointed out the relative importance <strong>of</strong> the second-order components<br />
<strong>of</strong> the motion.<br />
unrestrained motion (surge) [m]<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
-0.5<br />
x 10-3<br />
1<br />
-1<br />
0 5 10 15 20 25<br />
Time [s]<br />
unrestrained motion (heave) [m]<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
-0.5<br />
x 10-3<br />
1<br />
-1<br />
-1.5<br />
0 5 10 15 20 25<br />
Time [s]<br />
107<br />
unrestrained motion (pitch) [deg]<br />
0.015<br />
0.01<br />
0.005<br />
0<br />
-0.005<br />
-0.01<br />
-0.015<br />
0 5 10 15 20 25<br />
Time [s]<br />
Figure 8.16: Comparisons between first and second-order unrestrained motions in surge, heave and pitch modes <strong>for</strong> the<br />
OC3-Hywind <strong>for</strong> a Pierson-Moskowitz spectrum with Hs=0.5 m (Tp=3.54 s).<br />
Pierson-Moskowitz spectrum with Hs=2.5 m<br />
The first and second-order excitation <strong>for</strong>ces in surge, heave and pitch modes <strong>for</strong> the OC3-Hywind associated<br />
with the Pierson-Moskowitz spectrum with Hs=2.5m (Tp=7.9s) are shown in Figure 8.17. As in the previous<br />
case (Hs=0.5m) the influence <strong>of</strong> the second-order components is more important in surge and pitch modes.<br />
The presence <strong>of</strong> higher frequency components in surge and pitch are due to the predominance <strong>of</strong> the sumfrequency<br />
<strong>for</strong>ce QTFs <strong>for</strong> these modes.<br />
Excitation Force in surge [MN]<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
-0.5<br />
-1<br />
-1.5<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50<br />
Time [s]<br />
Excitation Force in heave [MN]<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0<br />
-0.1<br />
-0.2<br />
-0.3<br />
-0.4<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50<br />
Time [s]<br />
Excitation Force (pitch) [MN.m]<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
-50<br />
-100<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50<br />
Time [s]<br />
Figure 8.17: First and second-order excitation <strong>for</strong>ces in surge, heave and pitch modes <strong>of</strong> the OC3-Hywind <strong>for</strong> a Pierson-<br />
Moskowitz spectrum with Hs=2.5 m (Tp = 7.9 s).<br />
The comparisons <strong>of</strong> first and second-order unrestrained motions in surge, heave and pitch <strong>for</strong> the OC3-Hywind<br />
<strong>for</strong> a Pierson Moskowitz spectrum with Hs=2.5 m (Tp=7.9 s) are shown in Figure 8.18. The unrestrained motions<br />
<strong>of</strong> this structure are very small. The second-order component is dominant in surge, in heave has very little importance<br />
and in pitch is <strong>of</strong> the same importance as the first-order component.