22.12.2012 Views

Final report for WP4.3: Enhancement of design methods ... - Upwind

Final report for WP4.3: Enhancement of design methods ... - Upwind

Final report for WP4.3: Enhancement of design methods ... - Upwind

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

are capturing the worst case loading. This significantly reduces the number <strong>of</strong> simulations required in the<br />

preliminary extreme load analysis.<br />

It is important to note, however, that <strong>for</strong> detailed <strong>design</strong> using the most conservative load will not necessarily<br />

result in the most cost effective support structures. Rather, the load with a return period <strong>of</strong> 50 years<br />

should be used. This implies that a statistical approach should be used as a basis <strong>for</strong> the rules in the<br />

standard.<br />

Tide height<br />

The baseline extreme loads were calculated with the tide height at HSWL, equal to +3.29m. This is the<br />

upper bound <strong>of</strong> the range specified by the IEC standard [69], which is generally considered to be conservative.<br />

In order to test the influence <strong>of</strong> the tide height on the extreme jacket loading, three additional cases<br />

were considered in addition to the baseline case with tide heights varying from LSWL to HSWL+2.13m.<br />

Normalised axial <strong>for</strong>ce<br />

1.1<br />

1.05<br />

1<br />

0.95<br />

0.9<br />

0.85<br />

0.8<br />

LSWL HAT HSWL HSWL+2.13m<br />

Mbr 1 End 1 Mbr 2 End 1 Mbr 3 End 1 Mbr 4 End 1<br />

Figure 5.18: Normalised extreme loads at pile head, with variation in tide height<br />

Figure 5.18 presents normalized extreme loads at the pile head <strong>for</strong> the four different cases. The results<br />

confirm that higher water levels result in higher extreme loads, although the load increases are smaller in<br />

magnitude than when the wave period is varied. Again, this is an important result because it enables <strong>design</strong>ers<br />

to per<strong>for</strong>m extreme load calculations at a single water level with greater confidence that they are<br />

capturing the worst case loading.<br />

5.4.3 Summary and key findings<br />

The fatigue loading on the structure is found to be dominated by the wind, with a relatively low contribution<br />

from the hydrodynamics. This is reflected in the small changes in DEL when marine parameters are varied<br />

(tide height, wind-wave misalignment) compared to the large changes in DEL when wind parameters are<br />

varied (wind class). The small hydrodynamic influence is also shown in the fact that a decrease in<br />

availability leads to a reduction in loading. The parameter which has the most effect on fatigue loading is<br />

the structural natural frequency. This demonstrates the importance <strong>of</strong> placing the natural frequency in the<br />

right range when <strong>design</strong>ing a jacket support structure.<br />

The parameter which has the most effect on the extreme loading on the structure is the wave period <strong>of</strong><br />

the 50 year maximum wave. Conservative load results are given when this parameter is set to the lower<br />

bound <strong>of</strong> the range given in the standard.<br />

69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!