Final report for WP4.3: Enhancement of design methods ... - Upwind
Final report for WP4.3: Enhancement of design methods ... - Upwind
Final report for WP4.3: Enhancement of design methods ... - Upwind
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
are capturing the worst case loading. This significantly reduces the number <strong>of</strong> simulations required in the<br />
preliminary extreme load analysis.<br />
It is important to note, however, that <strong>for</strong> detailed <strong>design</strong> using the most conservative load will not necessarily<br />
result in the most cost effective support structures. Rather, the load with a return period <strong>of</strong> 50 years<br />
should be used. This implies that a statistical approach should be used as a basis <strong>for</strong> the rules in the<br />
standard.<br />
Tide height<br />
The baseline extreme loads were calculated with the tide height at HSWL, equal to +3.29m. This is the<br />
upper bound <strong>of</strong> the range specified by the IEC standard [69], which is generally considered to be conservative.<br />
In order to test the influence <strong>of</strong> the tide height on the extreme jacket loading, three additional cases<br />
were considered in addition to the baseline case with tide heights varying from LSWL to HSWL+2.13m.<br />
Normalised axial <strong>for</strong>ce<br />
1.1<br />
1.05<br />
1<br />
0.95<br />
0.9<br />
0.85<br />
0.8<br />
LSWL HAT HSWL HSWL+2.13m<br />
Mbr 1 End 1 Mbr 2 End 1 Mbr 3 End 1 Mbr 4 End 1<br />
Figure 5.18: Normalised extreme loads at pile head, with variation in tide height<br />
Figure 5.18 presents normalized extreme loads at the pile head <strong>for</strong> the four different cases. The results<br />
confirm that higher water levels result in higher extreme loads, although the load increases are smaller in<br />
magnitude than when the wave period is varied. Again, this is an important result because it enables <strong>design</strong>ers<br />
to per<strong>for</strong>m extreme load calculations at a single water level with greater confidence that they are<br />
capturing the worst case loading.<br />
5.4.3 Summary and key findings<br />
The fatigue loading on the structure is found to be dominated by the wind, with a relatively low contribution<br />
from the hydrodynamics. This is reflected in the small changes in DEL when marine parameters are varied<br />
(tide height, wind-wave misalignment) compared to the large changes in DEL when wind parameters are<br />
varied (wind class). The small hydrodynamic influence is also shown in the fact that a decrease in<br />
availability leads to a reduction in loading. The parameter which has the most effect on fatigue loading is<br />
the structural natural frequency. This demonstrates the importance <strong>of</strong> placing the natural frequency in the<br />
right range when <strong>design</strong>ing a jacket support structure.<br />
The parameter which has the most effect on the extreme loading on the structure is the wave period <strong>of</strong><br />
the 50 year maximum wave. Conservative load results are given when this parameter is set to the lower<br />
bound <strong>of</strong> the range given in the standard.<br />
69