Final report for WP4.3: Enhancement of design methods ... - Upwind
Final report for WP4.3: Enhancement of design methods ... - Upwind
Final report for WP4.3: Enhancement of design methods ... - Upwind
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
UPWIND WP4: Offshore Support Structures and Foundations<br />
MDD can produce any <strong>of</strong> the following outputs:<br />
• Graphical plots <strong>of</strong> the steady-state shape <strong>of</strong> the mooring;<br />
• Movie sequences showing the changing shape <strong>of</strong> the mooring in response to a time-varying current;<br />
• Tension in each segment <strong>of</strong> the mooring;<br />
• <strong>Final</strong> steady-state position <strong>of</strong> each component (horizontal and vertical);<br />
• <strong>Final</strong> angle <strong>of</strong> each component to the vertical;<br />
• Anchor mass required;<br />
• Adequacy <strong>of</strong> buoyancy elements in maintaining vertical position <strong>of</strong> the mooring.<br />
Key findings - MDD<br />
MDD is <strong>design</strong>ed as a stand-alone, self-contained mooring <strong>design</strong> package. It is not <strong>design</strong>ed to interact dynamically<br />
with other s<strong>of</strong>tware. In principle, as the MDD m-files are freely available, it would be possible to modify<br />
it so that it could be used as a mooring-<strong>for</strong>ce calculation module <strong>for</strong> a wind turbine package, but this would<br />
not be straight<strong>for</strong>ward. Also it only produces what are effectively steady-state solutions, which are suitable <strong>for</strong><br />
slowly-varying <strong>for</strong>ces like those from wind or currents, but would not be appropriate <strong>for</strong> wave-induced <strong>for</strong>ces.<br />
MDD as it currently exists is not suitable as a mooring analysis module <strong>for</strong> interfacing with wind turbine codes.<br />
Its most serious drawback is its inability to carry out a true dynamic analysis <strong>of</strong> moorings subjected to rapidlyvarying<br />
(wave-induced) loads, which would require a considerable extension. The principles <strong>of</strong> the approach<br />
are similar and some components (e.g. drag <strong>for</strong>ce calculation algorithms) and some <strong>of</strong> the post-processing<br />
capabilities may be useful (in both the frequency and time-domain).<br />
ROMEO<br />
ROMEO is a mooring and riser analysis package produced by GL Noble Denton. It can per<strong>for</strong>m both static and<br />
dynamic (frequency-domain) analysis in response to wind, wave and current loadings. Systems <strong>of</strong> up to 16<br />
mooring lines are supported. Riser calculations are ignored here.<br />
ROMEO carries out three types <strong>of</strong> analysis on a mooring system: static analysis, dynamic analysis (both wavefrequency<br />
and low-frequency) and then a quasi-static analysis which is a combination <strong>of</strong> the first two. The inputs<br />
<strong>for</strong> all analyses include the details <strong>of</strong> the moored device or ship, “no-load” mooring geometry, and environmental<br />
conditions.<br />
Static analysis<br />
The environmental inputs <strong>for</strong> static analysis are steady wind and current <strong>for</strong>ces. It is possible to enter current as<br />
a depth-dependent velocity pr<strong>of</strong>ile. The algorithm uses Morison’s equation to calculate the drag on the mooring<br />
lines. This equation gives the inline <strong>for</strong>ce (i.e. <strong>for</strong>ce in the direction <strong>of</strong> the flow) on the mooring line element as<br />
1<br />
= ρVu + ρCaV<br />
( u&<br />
− v&<br />
) + ρC<br />
( u − v)<br />
u − v<br />
2<br />
& [8-13]<br />
F d<br />
(i.e. the sum <strong>of</strong> Froude-Krylov <strong>for</strong>ce, hydrodynamic mass <strong>for</strong>ce, and drag <strong>for</strong>ce). It also calculates wind and current<br />
<strong>for</strong>ces on the ship (or the WEC) using a simple drag equation as a function <strong>of</strong> cross-flow area, height coefficients<br />
and shape coefficients <strong>for</strong> the body in question. The coefficients are loaded in as part <strong>of</strong> the vessel<br />
definition file, so they have to be obtained externally. They are typically obtained either by manual estimation or,<br />
if higher accuracy is needed and there is no published data available <strong>for</strong> similar-shaped objects, they would be<br />
scaled-up from model tests.<br />
The static analysis outputs consist <strong>of</strong>:<br />
• steady-state shapes <strong>of</strong> mooring catenaries.<br />
• steady-state (mean) position <strong>of</strong> the moored device.<br />
Dynamic and quasi-static analysis<br />
Dynamic analysis is carried out in the frequency-domain only. The following parameters are used to characterise<br />
the wave environment:<br />
• significant wave height.<br />
• zero up-crossing period.<br />
• spectral shape factor (peak enhancement factor, γ).<br />
123