Final report for WP4.3: Enhancement of design methods ... - Upwind
Final report for WP4.3: Enhancement of design methods ... - Upwind
Final report for WP4.3: Enhancement of design methods ... - Upwind
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
From these results it can be clearly seen that the loads on the jacket are dominated by the wind. This is<br />
due to the small member diameters in the jacket at the water level, which results in a relatively low contribution<br />
from the hydrodynamics. At the pile head the contribution from the waves is proportionally greater,<br />
as expected, but even at this depth the relative contribution from the waves is still small.<br />
The DEL histograms also show the effect <strong>of</strong> aerodynamic damping. The damage equivalent loading from<br />
combined wind and waves is lower than the sum <strong>of</strong> the damage calculated from the wind and waves<br />
separately. This is due to the damping <strong>of</strong> the wave-induced motion resulting from the rotor thrust.<br />
Wind-wave misalignment<br />
The baseline fatigue loads were calculated with codirectional wind and waves. In order to test the influence<br />
<strong>of</strong> wind-wave misalignment on jacket structures, three additional cases were considered with the<br />
wind-wave misalignment varied. The waves were considered to approach the structure at six different angles<br />
from the wind, from -30° to 120° in 30° intervals. A different proportion <strong>of</strong> time was then assigned to<br />
each wind-wave misalignment angle <strong>for</strong> the three cases. Case 3 models a uni<strong>for</strong>m distribution between all<br />
six misalignment angles, and Cases 1 and 2 are intermediate weightings. A graphical display <strong>of</strong> the cases<br />
considered is shown in Figure 5.9.<br />
Proportion <strong>of</strong> time spent at each<br />
misalignment [-]<br />
1.2<br />
1<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0<br />
Codirectional Case 1 Case 2 Case 3<br />
-30 0 30 60 90 120<br />
Wind/w ave misalignment [deg]<br />
Figure 5.9: Misalignment cases considered<br />
Figure 5.10 presents normalized DELs at the chosen output locations on the jacket <strong>for</strong> the four different<br />
cases. At the pile head the damage equivalent load increases by up to 2.5% when misalignment is taken<br />
into account. This is due to the additional <strong>for</strong>cing from the waves approaching from a different angle.<br />
However the DEL also increases by nearly 2% at the upper joint, which is located 15m above the water<br />
level. This may be due to the fact that jackets are relatively s<strong>of</strong>t in the torsional mode, which can be excited<br />
by large misalignments. The reduced aerodynamic damping may also have an effect.<br />
62