22.12.2012 Views

Final report for WP4.3: Enhancement of design methods ... - Upwind

Final report for WP4.3: Enhancement of design methods ... - Upwind

Final report for WP4.3: Enhancement of design methods ... - Upwind

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ated eigenfrequency is shifted into the upper 3P range - was <strong>for</strong>mulated in [20]. This is not confirmed <strong>for</strong><br />

the torsion, as the extreme values <strong>of</strong> the torsional moment as well as the corresponding DEL in the tower<br />

base are even reduced with the super-elements. The side-to-side loads are increased in terms <strong>of</strong> extremes,<br />

but the more important corresponding DELs do not show results that are that clear.<br />

For the DELs in the tripod itself, investigated at 11 different output positions, the results are not straight<strong>for</strong>ward<br />

to interpret at a first glance. Some loads increase, others decrease and some remain unchanged.<br />

The step from a beam to a super-element model activates effects increasing or decreasing local loads<br />

and - dependent on the position and load situation - one or the other effect may dominate. However the<br />

changes that do occur are significant, and the load paths in the statically over-determined structure seem<br />

to change globally. However, the largest changes <strong>of</strong> DEL with significant values show the clear tendency<br />

<strong>of</strong> decreased moments using the super-element model and these results show again the large differences<br />

in the DEL calculated with the two models.<br />

To conclude, more detailed studies are essential to fully understand the influence <strong>of</strong> the super-element<br />

approach <strong>for</strong> the loads simulation <strong>of</strong> OWT with tripod structures under realistic conditions. But it is obvious<br />

that the more detailed joint modeling with super-elements in the fully-coupled simulation leads to remarkable<br />

differences in the results and should there<strong>for</strong>e be applied <strong>for</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> structure.<br />

5. Development <strong>of</strong> <strong>design</strong> requirements<br />

As <strong>of</strong>fshore wind farm sites become larger and there is greater site variability, the optimization <strong>of</strong> support<br />

structure <strong>design</strong> and efficiency <strong>of</strong> the <strong>design</strong> process becomes increasingly important. In terms <strong>of</strong> the IEC<br />

61400-3 international <strong>design</strong> standard both normative requirements and in<strong>for</strong>mative methodologies need<br />

to be updated and improved in accordance with the advancement <strong>of</strong> the industry.<br />

Section 5.1 presents a summary <strong>of</strong> recommendations <strong>for</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> the international IEC 61400-<br />

3 <strong>design</strong> standard <strong>for</strong> bottom-mounted <strong>of</strong>fshore wind turbines. As part <strong>of</strong> WP4 an interim review <strong>of</strong> the first<br />

edition <strong>of</strong> the standard was per<strong>for</strong>med [22], including recommendations <strong>for</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> future editions.<br />

A review <strong>of</strong> various models <strong>for</strong> irregular, non-linear waves suitable <strong>for</strong> <strong>design</strong> purposes was also<br />

per<strong>for</strong>med, in order to judge their relevance <strong>for</strong> future <strong>of</strong>fshore wind farms (see [21]).<br />

Section 5.2 presents the results <strong>of</strong> reliability-based investigations into the required safety factor / Fatigue<br />

Design Factor (FDF) values to be used <strong>for</strong> fatigue <strong>design</strong> <strong>of</strong> steel sub-structures <strong>for</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshore wind turbines.<br />

Design and limit state equations are <strong>for</strong>mulated and stochastic models <strong>for</strong> the uncertain strength<br />

and load parameters are described.<br />

Section 5.3 presents recommendations <strong>for</strong> the implementation <strong>of</strong> a reduced set <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshore wind turbine<br />

<strong>design</strong> load cases according to the IEC 61400-3 standard <strong>for</strong> the preliminary <strong>design</strong> <strong>of</strong> jacket support<br />

structures. The number <strong>of</strong> <strong>design</strong> load cases required <strong>for</strong> full <strong>of</strong>fshore support structure <strong>design</strong> is potentially<br />

very large, and this can become even more impractical when complex multiple-member support<br />

structures are considered.<br />

Section 5.4 presents results from a <strong>design</strong> load case parameter analysis per<strong>for</strong>med <strong>for</strong> a jacket support<br />

structure, in order to investigate the driving fatigue and extreme load cases <strong>for</strong> this support structure type.<br />

5.1 Input to development <strong>of</strong> IEC 61400-3 standard<br />

The IEC 61400-3 standard [69] provides a set <strong>of</strong> international guidelines <strong>for</strong> the <strong>design</strong> <strong>of</strong> bottom-mounted<br />

<strong>of</strong>fshore wind turbines. The standard, which was developed by a working group <strong>of</strong> international experts,<br />

provides <strong>design</strong> requirements <strong>for</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshore wind turbines and their support structures, and provides much<br />

needed international consistency in a rapidly growing industry.<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!