22.12.2012 Views

Final report for WP4.3: Enhancement of design methods ... - Upwind

Final report for WP4.3: Enhancement of design methods ... - Upwind

Final report for WP4.3: Enhancement of design methods ... - Upwind

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A Fracture Mechanical (FM) modelling <strong>of</strong> the crack growth is applied assuming that the crack can be<br />

modelled by a 2-dimensional semi-elliptical crack. It is assumed that the fatigue life may be represented<br />

by a fatigue initiation life and a fatigue propagation life. It is there<strong>for</strong>e:<br />

N N N + =<br />

I<br />

P<br />

Where N is the number <strong>of</strong> stress cycles to failure, NI is the number <strong>of</strong> stress cycles to crack propagation<br />

and NP is the number <strong>of</strong> stress cycles from initiation to crack through.<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> stress cycles from initiation to crack through is determined on the basis <strong>of</strong> a twodimensional<br />

crack growth model. The crack is assumed to be semi-elliptical with length 2c and depth a.<br />

The crack growth can be described by the following two coupled differential equations.<br />

da<br />

= C<br />

dN<br />

dc<br />

= C<br />

dN<br />

A<br />

C<br />

m ( ∆K<br />

) a(<br />

N )<br />

A<br />

m ( ∆KC<br />

) c(<br />

N0<br />

) = c0<br />

0<br />

= a<br />

0<br />

Where CA, CC and m are material parameters, a0 and c0 describe the crack depth a and crack length c,<br />

respectively, after NI cycles and where the stress intensity ranges are ∆KA(∆σ) and ∆KC(∆σ). ∆KA and ∆KC<br />

are obtained based on the models in [49] and [50].<br />

The stress range ∆σ is obtained from<br />

∆σ = XWave XSCF ·Y·∆σ e<br />

where XWave, XSCF are model uncertainties, Y is the model uncertainty related to geometry function and<br />

∆σ e is the equivalent stress range:<br />

e 1<br />

∆σ<br />

=<br />

⎣n<br />

⎡ nσ<br />

⎢ ∑ ni∆<br />

i=<br />

1<br />

1/<br />

m<br />

m ⎤<br />

i<br />

σ ⎥<br />

⎦<br />

48<br />

= σ n<br />

The total number <strong>of</strong> stress ranges per year is n ∑ ni<br />

.<br />

i=<br />

1<br />

In the assessment <strong>of</strong> the equivalent constant stress range the effect <strong>of</strong> a possible lower threshold value<br />

∆KTH on the crack growth inducing stress intensity factor ∆K has not been taken into account explicitly.<br />

This effect is assumed implicitly accounted <strong>for</strong> by evaluation <strong>of</strong> the equivalent stress range using the appropriate<br />

SN-curve exponent m.<br />

The crack initiation time NI is modelled as Weibull distributed with expected value µ0 and coefficient <strong>of</strong><br />

variation equal to 0.35, see e.g. [51].<br />

The limit state function is written<br />

g<br />

( X)<br />

= N − n t<br />

where t is time in the interval from 0 to the service life TL.<br />

To model the effect <strong>of</strong> different weld qualities, different values <strong>of</strong> the crack depth at initiation a0 can be<br />

used. The corresponding assumed length is 5 times the crack depth. The critical crack depth ac is taken<br />

as the thickness <strong>of</strong> the tubular member.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!