06.09.2021 Views

Torts - Cases, Principles, and Institutions Fifth Edition, 2016a

Torts - Cases, Principles, and Institutions Fifth Edition, 2016a

Torts - Cases, Principles, and Institutions Fifth Edition, 2016a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Witt & Tani, TCPI 1. Introduction<br />

those claims, <strong>and</strong> whether to withdraw from prosecuting them. The result is that almost all parties<br />

settle their disputes before trial.<br />

Settlement has been widespread in American tort law for as long as modern tort law has<br />

existed, for more than a century <strong>and</strong> a half, <strong>and</strong> there is reason to think settlement is growing even<br />

more common in the past fifty years. In 2003, the American Bar Association Litigation Section<br />

held a symposium titled The Vanishing Trial, which concluded that the “portion of federal civil<br />

cases resolved by federal trial fell from 11.5 percent [of all filings] in 1962 to 1.8 percent in<br />

2002.” Marc Galanter, The Vanishing Trial: An Examination of Trials <strong>and</strong> Related Matters in<br />

Federal <strong>and</strong> State Courts, 1 J. EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUD. 459, 459 (2004). Between 2008 <strong>and</strong> 2012,<br />

a mere “0.56 percent or slightly more than one-half of one percent of all terminations” occurred<br />

by civil jury trials. Charles S. Coody, Vanishing Trial Skills, A.B.A. (May 22, 2013),<br />

https://perma.cc/QE5C-LPNS. The following chart, compiled by Marc Galanter, who led the<br />

ABA study, <strong>and</strong> his co-author, shows the stark picture of settlement in civil litigation generally:<br />

Percentage of Civil Terminations During or After Trial, U.S. District Courts, 1962-2010<br />

Source: Marc Galanter & Angela Frozena, The Continuing Decline of Civil Trials in American Courts, POUND<br />

CIVIL JUSTICE INST. 1, 3 (2011), https://perma.cc/9NFE-AP2M.<br />

Parties settle because, as the Vosburgs <strong>and</strong> Putneys learned, litigation is expensive <strong>and</strong><br />

time-consuming. Many parties are risk-averse; they have a preference for the certainty that<br />

settlement offers. Moreover, there is reason to think that on the plaintiffs’ side, lawyers paid on a<br />

contingency basis, as a percentage of any settlement or award, will have an interest in avoiding<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!