06.09.2021 Views

Torts - Cases, Principles, and Institutions Fifth Edition, 2016a

Torts - Cases, Principles, and Institutions Fifth Edition, 2016a

Torts - Cases, Principles, and Institutions Fifth Edition, 2016a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Witt & Tani, TCPI 10. Damages<br />

[A] lawyer, Alan L. Fuchsberg, was estimating the value of a case involving<br />

another man who died on Sept. 11. He was 42 <strong>and</strong> earned $54,000 as a clerk in a<br />

financial firm in the World Trade Center. Mr. Fuchsberg said the clerk’s case might<br />

bring a substantial award for pain <strong>and</strong> suffering. The office he worked for was on<br />

the 90th floor of the second tower to be hit, where there were announcements<br />

encouraging people to return to their desks while the first tower burned.<br />

The clerk, Mr. Fuchsberg said, would have had plenty of time to underst<strong>and</strong> his<br />

circumstances. “Obviously,” the lawyer said, “it got very smoky <strong>and</strong> hot <strong>and</strong><br />

unbearable.” But Mr. Fuchsberg said he told the clerk’s father to expect a<br />

comparatively small award for economic damages, especially if it was difficult to<br />

prove that the clerk, who was single, provided substantial support to his aging<br />

parents. Mr. Fuchsberg said some claims for single people with no dependents<br />

could be worth as little as $100,000.<br />

The clerk’s father, who asked not to be named, said he was stunned to learn the role<br />

a person’s income played in lawyers’ math. “The value of a life is certainly not<br />

determined based on earnings,” he said, his voice breaking. “We’re talking about<br />

my son.”<br />

William Glaberson, Lawyer Math in Sept. 11 Deaths Shows Varying Values for a Life,<br />

N.Y. TIMES, Nov. 11, 2001.<br />

5. Wages versus wealth. Of course the income-tracking effect of tort damages does not<br />

perfectly reflect wealth per se: it reflects income. Tort damages doctrine treats people with high<br />

income <strong>and</strong> low wealth, for example, very differently from people with low income <strong>and</strong> high<br />

wealth. A retired person with no wages but significant retirement savings will often receive little<br />

in pecuniary damages if she suffers no lost income. At the same time, a working person with high<br />

wages but no savings will receive a significantly higher award. The assets of the retiree would not<br />

be taken into account, because those assets would still be available to the plaintiff or the plaintiff’s<br />

estate after the tort. In practice, wealth <strong>and</strong> income are extremely correlated. Low-income<br />

households are unlikely to have significant net worth <strong>and</strong> most low-wealth households do not<br />

have high incomes. See CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE, AN ANALYSIS OF THE DISTRIBUTION<br />

OF WEALTH ACROSS HOUSEHOLDS, 1989-2010 (2012).<br />

6. Wage differentials. The Pew Foundation has produced the following chart depicting wage<br />

differentials by race <strong>and</strong> gender. What does it mean for tort damages?<br />

622

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!