06.09.2021 Views

Torts - Cases, Principles, and Institutions Fifth Edition, 2016a

Torts - Cases, Principles, and Institutions Fifth Edition, 2016a

Torts - Cases, Principles, and Institutions Fifth Edition, 2016a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Witt & Tani, TCPI 5. Plaintiffs’ Conduct<br />

Not<br />

Enforced<br />

Louisiana<br />

Montana<br />

Virginia<br />

Likelihood to Enforce Liability Waivers<br />

Strict St<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

Moderate<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

Lenient St<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

Alaska<br />

Colorado Alabama<br />

Arkansas<br />

Florida<br />

Kansas<br />

Connecticut Illinois<br />

Massachusetts<br />

Hawaii<br />

Minnesota Nebraska<br />

Kentucky North Carolina Ohio<br />

Mississippi Oregon<br />

Georgia<br />

Nevada<br />

South Dakota Maryl<strong>and</strong><br />

New Jersey Washington Michigan<br />

Pennsylvania Iowa<br />

North Dakota<br />

Vermont<br />

D.C.<br />

Tennessee<br />

Arizona<br />

Idaho<br />

California New Mexico<br />

Delaware Oklahoma<br />

Indiana<br />

South Carolina<br />

Maine<br />

Texas<br />

Montana<br />

West Virginia<br />

New Hampshire<br />

New York<br />

Utah<br />

Wisconsin<br />

Likelihood to Enforce Parental Waivers<br />

Insufficient<br />

Information<br />

Puerto Rico<br />

Rhode Isl<strong>and</strong><br />

Very unlikely<br />

Courts have refused<br />

to enforce<br />

Possible<br />

Rulings indicate<br />

enforcement<br />

possibility<br />

Excellent<br />

There is a statue in<br />

place* or courts have<br />

enforced in one or<br />

more cases<br />

Insufficient<br />

Information<br />

Alaska<br />

Arkansas<br />

Louisiana<br />

Montana<br />

Tennessee<br />

Virginia<br />

Hawaii<br />

Maine<br />

New Jersey<br />

Texas<br />

Washington<br />

Illinois<br />

Michigan<br />

Pennsylvania<br />

Utah<br />

West Virginia<br />

Arizona<br />

Idaho<br />

Mississippi<br />

Alaska*<br />

Colorado*<br />

Florida<br />

Massachusetts<br />

Ohio<br />

California<br />

Connecticut<br />

Georgia<br />

Indiana<br />

Wisconsin<br />

Alabama<br />

Iowa<br />

Maryl<strong>and</strong><br />

North Carolina<br />

New Mexico<br />

Oklahoma<br />

South Carolina<br />

Wyoming<br />

Delaware<br />

Indiana<br />

Minnesota<br />

Nebraska<br />

Nevada<br />

Oregon<br />

South Dakota<br />

Kansas<br />

Kentucky<br />

Montana<br />

New Hampshire<br />

New York<br />

Rhode Isl<strong>and</strong><br />

Vermont<br />

Source: DOYICE J. COTTEN & MARY B. COTTEN, WAIVERS AND RELEASES OF LIABILITY (9th ed. 2016)<br />

What the Tunkl court itself observed still apparently holds true: “No definition of the<br />

concept of public interest can be contained within the four corners of a formula. The concept,<br />

always the subject of great debate, has ranged over the whole course of the common law; rather<br />

than attempt to prescribe its nature, we can only designate the situations in which it has been<br />

applied.” 383 P.2d at 444.<br />

285

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!