06.09.2021 Views

Torts - Cases, Principles, and Institutions Fifth Edition, 2016a

Torts - Cases, Principles, and Institutions Fifth Edition, 2016a

Torts - Cases, Principles, and Institutions Fifth Edition, 2016a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Witt & Tani, TCPI 6. Causation<br />

JUSTICE, CHANGES IN THE STANDARDS FOR ADMITTING EXPERT EVIDENCE IN FEDERAL CIVIL CASES<br />

SINCE THE DAUBERT DECISION (2001). Overall, the percentage of torts cases in federal court<br />

resolved by trial has fallen from 16.5% in 1963 to 2.2% in 2002. While all subject areas have<br />

seen declines in the percentage of cases resolved by trial, torts have experienced a<br />

disproportionate drop. <strong>Torts</strong> cases constituted 55% of all federal trials in 1962; today they make<br />

up only 23% of trials. Marc Galanter, The Vanishing Trial: An Examination of Trials <strong>and</strong> Related<br />

Matters in Federal <strong>and</strong> State Courts, 1 J. EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUD. 459, 466 (2004).<br />

4. Agent Orange. The U.S. military used an herbicide called Agent Orange in the Vietnam<br />

War to eliminate the foliage that provided cover to North Vietnamese forces. From 1965 to 1970,<br />

thous<strong>and</strong>s of American soldiers <strong>and</strong> millions of Vietnamese civilians were exposed to the<br />

herbicide. Throughout the 1970s, evidence began to accumulate that Agent Orange was highly<br />

toxic, linked to cancer <strong>and</strong> other conditions in people exposed to the substance <strong>and</strong> birth defects in<br />

their children. In 1979, veterans filed a lawsuit against the manufacturers of Agent Orange, <strong>and</strong><br />

their cases were consolidated into a single multi-district litigation in New York. Agent Orange<br />

was a classic indeterminate plaintiff case; the herbicide may well have increased the risk of some<br />

injuries, but it was difficult to say exactly how much risk it added <strong>and</strong> even harder to identify<br />

which plaintiffs would not have suffered their injuries without Agent Orange. The lawsuit<br />

dragged on for years until Judge Jack Weinstein was assigned to the case. Brilliant <strong>and</strong> daring<br />

(<strong>and</strong> controversial), Judge Weinstein wielded all the tools he was allowed to use, <strong>and</strong> possibly<br />

some he wasn’t, to pressure the parties into a settlement. The $180-million compensation fund<br />

created for the plaintiffs was one of the largest <strong>and</strong> most complex mass tort settlements the<br />

country had seen. Judge Weinstein then dismissed the claims of the veterans who had opted out<br />

of the class on summary judgment, concluding that they had failed to establish that Agent Orange<br />

was the cause of their injuries. The dismissal came despite multiple credentialed expert witnesses<br />

for the plaintiffs testifying about studies contending that Agent Orange may have caused the<br />

harms the plaintiffs suffered. Critics have contended ever since that Weinstein delved into<br />

questions of the applicability <strong>and</strong> reliability of the studies that were properly left for a jury. For a<br />

detailed account, see Peter Schuck’s classic treatment, Agent Orange on Trial (1987).<br />

5. Bisphenol A. Bisphenol A (BPA), a ubiquitous industrial chemical in plastics, food<br />

packaging, baby bottles, <strong>and</strong> other areas, cuts against the conventional dose-response wisdom.<br />

While st<strong>and</strong>ard toxicology studies indicated that Bisphenol A is safe, new studies that look at<br />

significantly lower doses of Bisphenol A show that Bisphenol A may have harmful effects in<br />

infants. U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMIN., Bisphenol A: Use in Food Contact Application, Mar.<br />

2013, available at https://perma.cc/2KBA-K3QX. Unlike almost all drugs (such as Danocrine,<br />

the drug in Zuchowicz), Bisphenol A is actually more likely to cause harm when consumed in<br />

small doses by infants because the hormone receptors of infants are more likely to confuse<br />

Bisphenol A for estrogen when it is present in very low doses, but not when it is present in the<br />

higher doses tested in the traditional toxicological studies. A confounding difficulty in measuring<br />

the effect of Bisphenol A is that most people are exposed to low doses of Bisphenol A through<br />

hundreds of daily interactions with packaging, plastics, or even paper receipts. Frederick S. vom<br />

Saal & Claude Hughes, An Extensive New Literature Concerning Low-Dose Effects of Bisphenol<br />

A Shows the Need for a New Risk Assessment, 113 ENVIRON. HEALTH PERSPECT. 926 (2005). In<br />

2008, major manufacturers of baby bottles voluntarily removed Bisphenol A from their products,<br />

due to public pressure, as the FDA continued to study the issue. Press Release, Conn. Attorney<br />

Gen. Office, Attorney Gen. Announces Baby Bottle Makers Agree to Stop Using BPA; Calls for<br />

310

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!