06.09.2021 Views

Calculus- Early Transcendentals, 2021a

Calculus- Early Transcendentals, 2021a

Calculus- Early Transcendentals, 2021a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

550 Vector <strong>Calculus</strong><br />

We can now rewrite Green’s Theorem using the concepts of divergence and curl; these rewritten versions<br />

in turn are closer to some later theorems we will see.<br />

Suppose we write a two dimensional vector field in the form f = 〈 f 1 , f 2 ,0〉, where f 1 and f 2 are functions<br />

of x and y. Then<br />

i j k<br />

∇ × f =<br />

∂ ∂ ∂<br />

∂x ∂y ∂z<br />

∣ f 1 f 2 0 ∣ = 〈0,0, ∂ f 2<br />

∂x − ∂ f 1<br />

∂y 〉,<br />

and so (∇ × f) · k = 〈0,0, ∂ f 2<br />

∂x − ∂ f 1<br />

∂y 〉·〈0,0,1〉 = ∂ f 2<br />

∫<br />

∂D<br />

∫<br />

f · dr =<br />

∂D<br />

∫∫<br />

f 1 dx+ f 2 dy =<br />

∂x − ∂ f 1<br />

∂y<br />

D<br />

. So Green’s Theorem says<br />

∂ f 2<br />

∂x − ∂ f 1<br />

∂y<br />

∫∫D<br />

dA = (∇ × f) · kdA. (16.2)<br />

Roughly speaking, the right-most integral adds up the curl (tendency to swirl) at each point in the region;<br />

the left-most integral adds up the tangential components of the vector field around the entire boundary.<br />

Green’s Theorem says these are equal, or roughly, that the sum of the “microscopic” swirls over the region<br />

is the same as the “macroscopic” swirl around the boundary.<br />

Next, suppose that the boundary ∂D has a vector form r(t), sothatr ′ (t) is tangent to the boundary,<br />

and T = r ′ (t)/|r ′ (t)| is the usual unit tangent vector. Writing r = 〈x(t),y(t)〉 we get<br />

T = 〈x′ ,y ′ 〉<br />

|r ′ (t)|<br />

and then<br />

N = 〈y′ ,−x ′ 〉<br />

|r ′ (t)|<br />

is a unit vector perpendicular to T, that is, a unit normal to the boundary. Now<br />

∫<br />

∂D<br />

∫<br />

f · Nds =<br />

∫<br />

=<br />

∂D<br />

∂D<br />

〈 f 1 , f 〉·〈y′ ,−x ′ ∫<br />

〉<br />

2<br />

|r ′ |r ′ (t)|dt = f 1 y ′ dt − f 2 x ′ dt<br />

(t)|<br />

∂D<br />

∫<br />

f 1 dy− f 2 dx = − f 2 dx+ f 1 dy.<br />

So far, we’ve just rewritten the original integral using alternate notation. The last integral looks just<br />

like the left side of Green’s Theorem (16.12) except that f 1 and f 2 have traded places and f 2 has acquired<br />

a negative sign. Then applying Green’s Theorem we get<br />

∫<br />

∂D<br />

∫∫<br />

− f 2 dx+ f 1 dy =<br />

Summarizing the long string of equalities,<br />

∫<br />

∂D<br />

D<br />

∂D<br />

∫∫<br />

f · Nds =<br />

∂ f 1<br />

∂x + ∂ f 2<br />

∂y<br />

∫∫D<br />

dA = ∇ · fdA.<br />

D<br />

∇ · fdA. (16.3)<br />

Roughly speaking, the first integral adds up the flow across the boundary of the region, from inside to out,<br />

and the second sums the divergence (tendency to spread) at each point in the interior. The theorem roughly<br />

says that the sum of the “microscopic” spreads is the same as the total spread across the boundary and out<br />

of the region.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!