Journal of Biblical Literature - Society of Biblical Literature
Journal of Biblical Literature - Society of Biblical Literature
Journal of Biblical Literature - Society of Biblical Literature
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
352 <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Biblical</strong> <strong>Literature</strong><br />
erary independent source that was likely included in the wall-building narrative by<br />
Nehemiah himself (p. 86) are without any historical pro<strong>of</strong> and do more to weaken the<br />
credibility <strong>of</strong> a study that is otherwise concerned with internal, literary evidence. Nevertheless,<br />
the questions raised by Reinmuth are relevant and intriguing, and one can hope<br />
that this study will stimulate other investigations into the sociology <strong>of</strong> the book and the<br />
intertextual relationships between the book <strong>of</strong> Nehemiah and other parts <strong>of</strong> the Hebrew<br />
Bible, especially the priestly legislation <strong>of</strong> the Pentateuch. Much work remains to be<br />
done in this area. It is not implausible to expect that future studies will in fact confirm<br />
many <strong>of</strong> Reinmuth’s conclusions.<br />
Armin Siedlecki<br />
Emory University, Decatur, GA 30033<br />
The Most Magic Word: Essays on Babylonian and <strong>Biblical</strong> <strong>Literature</strong>, by William L.<br />
Moran. Edited by Ronald S. Hendel. CBQMS 35. Washington, DC: Catholic <strong>Biblical</strong><br />
Association <strong>of</strong> America, 2002. Pp. x + 212. $11.50 (paper). ISBN 0915170345.<br />
In a distinguished academic career extending over half a century, the late William<br />
L. Moran, Andrew W. Mellon Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> the Humanities at Harvard University,<br />
authored nearly seventy articles, a hundred critical reviews, and a volume <strong>of</strong> translations<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Amarna letters (produced in French and translated into English). He also edited<br />
the Assyrian Dictionary <strong>of</strong> the Oriental Institute <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Chicago, vol. 7<br />
(I/J), a volume known for its particular excellence. The current collection containing fifteen<br />
articles, two in print for the first time, samples but a small, tantalizing taste <strong>of</strong> the<br />
author’s scholarly legacy. Missing are examples <strong>of</strong> Moran’s numerous contributions concerning<br />
the Amarna letters (a career-long occupation and arguably his major field <strong>of</strong><br />
endeavor; see William L. Moran, Amarna Studies: Collected Writings [ed. John Huehnergard<br />
and Shlomo Izre’el; HSS 54; Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2003]), Northwest<br />
Semitic philology, Assyriology proper, and certain major Mesopotamian myths such as<br />
Enuma Elish and Anzu. The works in this volume, selected apparently for their “biblical”<br />
import, epitomize nonetheless the evaluation in the introduction to his Festschrift:<br />
“But his work has also always had a special appeal. Regardless <strong>of</strong> the topic, there is in his<br />
approach a humane quality, a concern for broader issues that expresses the intellectual<br />
and vital excitement that he brings to the text” (Tzvi Abusch, John Huehnergard, and<br />
Piotr Steinkeller, eds., Lingering over Words: Studies in Ancient Near Eastern <strong>Literature</strong><br />
in Honor <strong>of</strong> William L. Moran [HSS 37; Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1990], x).<br />
The title <strong>of</strong> this volume is borrowed from Rainer Maria Rilke’s impression <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Gilgamesh Epic (read in Ungnad’s German translation) as “das zaubernde Wort zu<br />
irgendeiner Zeit.” Its use testifies to Moran’s conviction that ancient Mesopotamian literature<br />
was not an arcane corpus <strong>of</strong> interest only to a handful <strong>of</strong> scholars conversant in<br />
dead languages but <strong>of</strong> highest humanistic value <strong>of</strong> concern to people <strong>of</strong> culture even in<br />
modern times. Moran’s commitment to human culture in general even while studying<br />
the ancient Near East finds expression in his frequent citations in foreign languages,<br />
abundant use <strong>of</strong> Latin expressions, and, most significantly, comparative use <strong>of</strong> classical<br />
literature to explain Mesopotamian writings. In the same vein, <strong>of</strong> the essays selected for<br />
publication, one discusses Gilgamesh’s coming to grips with his own humanity, another