Journal of Biblical Literature - Society of Biblical Literature
Journal of Biblical Literature - Society of Biblical Literature
Journal of Biblical Literature - Society of Biblical Literature
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
262 <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Biblical</strong> <strong>Literature</strong><br />
rabbinic. 33 The codes <strong>of</strong> Hellenistic Judaism present the closest correlate to the<br />
Haustafeln because <strong>of</strong> the reciprocity <strong>of</strong> the instructions they contain, and<br />
there is evidence in rabbinic literature for reciprocity in dealing with the duties<br />
<strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong> the family. 34<br />
But there is no existing rabbinic code that includes all <strong>of</strong> the Haustafel elements.<br />
In the Mishnah, women, slaves, and children were exempted from<br />
responsibility rather than positively exhorted, and they were discussed in terms<br />
<strong>of</strong> cultic situations rather than household relationships. The sentence structure<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Haustafel is not present, nor is the direct address. The importance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
rabbinic tradition lay in furnishing an interest in the behavior <strong>of</strong> inferior<br />
groups. 35<br />
Hellenistic Jewish codes, however, parallel the Haustafeln in important<br />
ways. For example, the order in which the relationships are discussed in Philo<br />
—husbands–wives, parents–children, masters–slaves—corresponds exactly to<br />
the order <strong>of</strong> the presentations in the Colossian Haustafel. Philo was also the<br />
first extant writer to limit a single code to these three specific pairs; and<br />
33 Such first-century rabbinic sources are hypothetical, <strong>of</strong> course. The connection with the<br />
Haustafel was first suggested by Ernst Lohmeyer (An die Kolosser, 152–59). These three groups<br />
had neither the rights nor the responsibilities <strong>of</strong> the adult, free, male members <strong>of</strong> the community,<br />
and they are nearly always mentioned together in rabbinic texts as “women, slaves, and minors.”<br />
See, e.g., m. Ber. 3:3; 7:2; m. Sukkah 2:8; and m. Naz. 9:1. Lohmeyer concluded that there must<br />
have been a Jewish code that listed the specific duties <strong>of</strong> these groups and that the Christian<br />
Haustafel form was an adaptation <strong>of</strong> this code.<br />
34 Although the vast majority <strong>of</strong> rules in the Mishnaic literature concern the duties <strong>of</strong> men,<br />
some are reciprocal and some focus on the duties <strong>of</strong> the groups considered “inferior.” T. Qidd. 1:7,<br />
for example, discusses the reciprocal duties <strong>of</strong> father and son; m. Pe