27.12.2012 Views

Journal of Biblical Literature - Society of Biblical Literature

Journal of Biblical Literature - Society of Biblical Literature

Journal of Biblical Literature - Society of Biblical Literature

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Book Reviews<br />

recent analysis and insightful discussion in Michael O. Wise, “Dating the Teacher <strong>of</strong><br />

Righteousness and the Floruit <strong>of</strong> his Movement,” JBL 122 [2003]: 53–87).<br />

Magness’s findings suggest that although Qumranology may not be in a state <strong>of</strong><br />

chaos, it is far from the “impressive consensus” that Charlesworth believes the field has<br />

reached (p. 21). A deeper look into the issues raised in these two outstanding books raises<br />

the disturbing thought that we would perhaps be closer to a consensus regarding the<br />

archaeology <strong>of</strong> Khirbet Qumran if not for the perplexing references contained in the<br />

pesharim and related Dead Sea Scrolls (for an examination <strong>of</strong> the pesharim apart from the<br />

archaeology <strong>of</strong> Khirbet Qumran, see the excellent treatment <strong>of</strong> Timothy H. Lim, Pesharim<br />

[Companion to the Qumran Scrolls 3; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2002]). Rather<br />

than serving as a model for the integration <strong>of</strong> texts and archaeological remains, the findings<br />

from Khirbet Qumran and the Dead Sea Scroll caves continue to defy all efforts toward<br />

reaching any kind <strong>of</strong> a consensus. Let us hope that the appearance <strong>of</strong> these two exceptional<br />

books will urge scholars to call for the prompt publication <strong>of</strong> all the archaeological<br />

findings and records from de Vaux’s excavations, lest the archaeology <strong>of</strong> Khirbet Qumran<br />

become the academic scandal par excellence <strong>of</strong> the twenty-first century.<br />

Kenneth Atkinson<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA 50614<br />

Pontius Pilate: Portraits <strong>of</strong> a Roman Governor, by Warren Carter. Interfaces Series.<br />

Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press/Michael Glazier, 2003. Pp. xii+162. $14.95 (paper).<br />

ISBN 0814651135.<br />

Interfaces is a new series <strong>of</strong> book-length character studies drawn from the Bible<br />

and intended for use in undergraduate classes. While serving as a focal point, a biblical<br />

character such as King Saul or John the Baptist also exposes students to a portion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Old or New Testament. The exposure is designed to be critical, with each study drawing<br />

on methodologies current in biblical studies, some even cutting edge. In lieu <strong>of</strong> the traditional<br />

survey course, it is suggested, a pr<strong>of</strong>essor may assign several <strong>of</strong> the Interfaces<br />

volumes during a semester to introduce students to a range <strong>of</strong> interpretive approaches<br />

as well as to a significant portion <strong>of</strong> biblical content. Included in the series is Warren<br />

Carter’s Pontius Pilate: Portaits <strong>of</strong> a Roman Governor, a book that endeavors to show<br />

how a relatively minor character in the Gospels can provide a window on issues <strong>of</strong> social<br />

justice and reflect significant literary artistry on the part <strong>of</strong> the evangelists.<br />

In ch. 1, Carter prepares the ground for his own views <strong>of</strong> the biblical Pilate by<br />

referring to several scholarly positions. He questions whether Pilate was, as many have<br />

held, an indecisive and ultimately weak governor who became a pawn <strong>of</strong> the Jewish<br />

leadership intent on executing Jesus. Carter disputes other standard descriptions <strong>of</strong><br />

Pilate’s role (e.g., Christian convert) before proposing that Pilate was arrogant and<br />

manipulative so as to protect the interests <strong>of</strong> the ruling elite as well as the structures <strong>of</strong><br />

Roman imperial power upon which those interests were based. In fact, this proposal<br />

becomes the book’s thesis, and as such it is developed in subsequent chapters from the<br />

perspectives <strong>of</strong> the four Gospels.<br />

In ch. 2, Carter explains his methodology: the character <strong>of</strong> Pilate is to be studied<br />

367

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!