Journal of Biblical Literature - Society of Biblical Literature
Journal of Biblical Literature - Society of Biblical Literature
Journal of Biblical Literature - Society of Biblical Literature
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Book Reviews<br />
recent analysis and insightful discussion in Michael O. Wise, “Dating the Teacher <strong>of</strong><br />
Righteousness and the Floruit <strong>of</strong> his Movement,” JBL 122 [2003]: 53–87).<br />
Magness’s findings suggest that although Qumranology may not be in a state <strong>of</strong><br />
chaos, it is far from the “impressive consensus” that Charlesworth believes the field has<br />
reached (p. 21). A deeper look into the issues raised in these two outstanding books raises<br />
the disturbing thought that we would perhaps be closer to a consensus regarding the<br />
archaeology <strong>of</strong> Khirbet Qumran if not for the perplexing references contained in the<br />
pesharim and related Dead Sea Scrolls (for an examination <strong>of</strong> the pesharim apart from the<br />
archaeology <strong>of</strong> Khirbet Qumran, see the excellent treatment <strong>of</strong> Timothy H. Lim, Pesharim<br />
[Companion to the Qumran Scrolls 3; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2002]). Rather<br />
than serving as a model for the integration <strong>of</strong> texts and archaeological remains, the findings<br />
from Khirbet Qumran and the Dead Sea Scroll caves continue to defy all efforts toward<br />
reaching any kind <strong>of</strong> a consensus. Let us hope that the appearance <strong>of</strong> these two exceptional<br />
books will urge scholars to call for the prompt publication <strong>of</strong> all the archaeological<br />
findings and records from de Vaux’s excavations, lest the archaeology <strong>of</strong> Khirbet Qumran<br />
become the academic scandal par excellence <strong>of</strong> the twenty-first century.<br />
Kenneth Atkinson<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA 50614<br />
Pontius Pilate: Portraits <strong>of</strong> a Roman Governor, by Warren Carter. Interfaces Series.<br />
Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press/Michael Glazier, 2003. Pp. xii+162. $14.95 (paper).<br />
ISBN 0814651135.<br />
Interfaces is a new series <strong>of</strong> book-length character studies drawn from the Bible<br />
and intended for use in undergraduate classes. While serving as a focal point, a biblical<br />
character such as King Saul or John the Baptist also exposes students to a portion <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Old or New Testament. The exposure is designed to be critical, with each study drawing<br />
on methodologies current in biblical studies, some even cutting edge. In lieu <strong>of</strong> the traditional<br />
survey course, it is suggested, a pr<strong>of</strong>essor may assign several <strong>of</strong> the Interfaces<br />
volumes during a semester to introduce students to a range <strong>of</strong> interpretive approaches<br />
as well as to a significant portion <strong>of</strong> biblical content. Included in the series is Warren<br />
Carter’s Pontius Pilate: Portaits <strong>of</strong> a Roman Governor, a book that endeavors to show<br />
how a relatively minor character in the Gospels can provide a window on issues <strong>of</strong> social<br />
justice and reflect significant literary artistry on the part <strong>of</strong> the evangelists.<br />
In ch. 1, Carter prepares the ground for his own views <strong>of</strong> the biblical Pilate by<br />
referring to several scholarly positions. He questions whether Pilate was, as many have<br />
held, an indecisive and ultimately weak governor who became a pawn <strong>of</strong> the Jewish<br />
leadership intent on executing Jesus. Carter disputes other standard descriptions <strong>of</strong><br />
Pilate’s role (e.g., Christian convert) before proposing that Pilate was arrogant and<br />
manipulative so as to protect the interests <strong>of</strong> the ruling elite as well as the structures <strong>of</strong><br />
Roman imperial power upon which those interests were based. In fact, this proposal<br />
becomes the book’s thesis, and as such it is developed in subsequent chapters from the<br />
perspectives <strong>of</strong> the four Gospels.<br />
In ch. 2, Carter explains his methodology: the character <strong>of</strong> Pilate is to be studied<br />
367