Journal of Biblical Literature - Society of Biblical Literature
Journal of Biblical Literature - Society of Biblical Literature
Journal of Biblical Literature - Society of Biblical Literature
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Bauman-Martin: Women on the Edge 269<br />
Slaves, accept the authority <strong>of</strong> your masters with all deference, not only those<br />
who are kind and gentle but also those who are harsh. For it is a credit to you<br />
if, being aware <strong>of</strong> God, you endure pain while suffering unjustly. If you<br />
endure when you are beaten for doing wrong, what credit is that? But if you<br />
endure when you do right and suffer for it, you have God’s approval. For to<br />
this you have been called, because Christ also suffered for you, leaving you an<br />
example, so that you could follow in his steps. 57<br />
The slaves addressed in this passage were for the most part household slaves, as<br />
is indicated by the urban nature <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> the areas to which the letter was sent<br />
and the author’s use <strong>of</strong> oijkevtai rather than douvloi. 58 The slaves would have<br />
been both male and female, but for the purposes <strong>of</strong> this article, I will concentrate<br />
on female slaves. 59 It is common knowledge among ancient historians that<br />
slaves in the Greco-Roman world were extremely vulnerable, especially physically.<br />
A slave’s body was available to her master in four major ways: for labor,<br />
corporal punishment, torture, and sexual service. 60 The first three might have<br />
been difficult and degrading but would not necessarily have come into conflict<br />
with her belief system. But the fourth responsibility, a slave’s obligation to have<br />
sex with her master, her master’s friends, or other slaves was inherently problematic<br />
for a Christian slave.<br />
Jennifer Glancy’s recent work regarding slaves in the Corinthian church<br />
highlights the conflict that would have arisen between Christian slaves’ desire<br />
to maintain sexual purity and their sexual obligations to their masters. 61 Glancy<br />
57 The NRSV translators use the traditional interpretation <strong>of</strong> the imperatival participles as<br />
imperatives, rather than translating them more accurately as participles.<br />
58 1 Peter is addressed to the Christians in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia,<br />
all well-populated with cities, with the possible exception <strong>of</strong> Galatia. It is uncertain whether by<br />
“Galatia” 1 Peter refers to northern Galatia, southern Galatia, or all <strong>of</strong> the area made into a<br />
province by Augustus. See Stephen Mitchell, Anatolia: Land, Men, and Gods in Asia Minor<br />
(2 vols.; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993). The other provinces were dotted with cities that<br />
had been visited by Paul.<br />
59 Male slaves would also have been subject to abuse; but in the Haustafeln the free women<br />
are also advised to remain submissive, and it is women today who are the individuals most likely to<br />
be “ministered to” with this passage. For these reasons, and because <strong>of</strong> the feminist focus on the<br />
women in the passage, I have chosen to limit the discussion to women. The term oijkevtai usually<br />
included all household slaves, including women (Sophocles, Trach. 908) and was also used <strong>of</strong><br />
women specifically (Aristophanes, Vespae 766). These sources were suggested to me by Shari<br />
Nakata <strong>of</strong> University <strong>of</strong> California, Irvine.<br />
60 Moses Finley includes the last three in Ancient Slavery and Modern Ideology (London:<br />
Chatto & Windus, 1980), 94–96. Household slaves were more vulnerable to sexual abuse because<br />
<strong>of</strong> their proximity to their owners.<br />
61 Glancy reemphasizes what Scott Bartchy had already noticed: that the sexual nature <strong>of</strong><br />
some master–slave relationships is not mentioned specifically in any NT text (“Slavery, Greco-<br />
Roman,” ABD 6:65–73) and that modern scholars have failed to look at the sex lives <strong>of</strong> Christian<br />
slaves (Glancy, “Obstacles to Slaves,” 482).