27.12.2012 Views

Journal of Biblical Literature - Society of Biblical Literature

Journal of Biblical Literature - Society of Biblical Literature

Journal of Biblical Literature - Society of Biblical Literature

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Bauman-Martin: Women on the Edge 269<br />

Slaves, accept the authority <strong>of</strong> your masters with all deference, not only those<br />

who are kind and gentle but also those who are harsh. For it is a credit to you<br />

if, being aware <strong>of</strong> God, you endure pain while suffering unjustly. If you<br />

endure when you are beaten for doing wrong, what credit is that? But if you<br />

endure when you do right and suffer for it, you have God’s approval. For to<br />

this you have been called, because Christ also suffered for you, leaving you an<br />

example, so that you could follow in his steps. 57<br />

The slaves addressed in this passage were for the most part household slaves, as<br />

is indicated by the urban nature <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> the areas to which the letter was sent<br />

and the author’s use <strong>of</strong> oijkevtai rather than douvloi. 58 The slaves would have<br />

been both male and female, but for the purposes <strong>of</strong> this article, I will concentrate<br />

on female slaves. 59 It is common knowledge among ancient historians that<br />

slaves in the Greco-Roman world were extremely vulnerable, especially physically.<br />

A slave’s body was available to her master in four major ways: for labor,<br />

corporal punishment, torture, and sexual service. 60 The first three might have<br />

been difficult and degrading but would not necessarily have come into conflict<br />

with her belief system. But the fourth responsibility, a slave’s obligation to have<br />

sex with her master, her master’s friends, or other slaves was inherently problematic<br />

for a Christian slave.<br />

Jennifer Glancy’s recent work regarding slaves in the Corinthian church<br />

highlights the conflict that would have arisen between Christian slaves’ desire<br />

to maintain sexual purity and their sexual obligations to their masters. 61 Glancy<br />

57 The NRSV translators use the traditional interpretation <strong>of</strong> the imperatival participles as<br />

imperatives, rather than translating them more accurately as participles.<br />

58 1 Peter is addressed to the Christians in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia,<br />

all well-populated with cities, with the possible exception <strong>of</strong> Galatia. It is uncertain whether by<br />

“Galatia” 1 Peter refers to northern Galatia, southern Galatia, or all <strong>of</strong> the area made into a<br />

province by Augustus. See Stephen Mitchell, Anatolia: Land, Men, and Gods in Asia Minor<br />

(2 vols.; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993). The other provinces were dotted with cities that<br />

had been visited by Paul.<br />

59 Male slaves would also have been subject to abuse; but in the Haustafeln the free women<br />

are also advised to remain submissive, and it is women today who are the individuals most likely to<br />

be “ministered to” with this passage. For these reasons, and because <strong>of</strong> the feminist focus on the<br />

women in the passage, I have chosen to limit the discussion to women. The term oijkevtai usually<br />

included all household slaves, including women (Sophocles, Trach. 908) and was also used <strong>of</strong><br />

women specifically (Aristophanes, Vespae 766). These sources were suggested to me by Shari<br />

Nakata <strong>of</strong> University <strong>of</strong> California, Irvine.<br />

60 Moses Finley includes the last three in Ancient Slavery and Modern Ideology (London:<br />

Chatto & Windus, 1980), 94–96. Household slaves were more vulnerable to sexual abuse because<br />

<strong>of</strong> their proximity to their owners.<br />

61 Glancy reemphasizes what Scott Bartchy had already noticed: that the sexual nature <strong>of</strong><br />

some master–slave relationships is not mentioned specifically in any NT text (“Slavery, Greco-<br />

Roman,” ABD 6:65–73) and that modern scholars have failed to look at the sex lives <strong>of</strong> Christian<br />

slaves (Glancy, “Obstacles to Slaves,” 482).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!