27.12.2012 Views

Journal of Biblical Literature - Society of Biblical Literature

Journal of Biblical Literature - Society of Biblical Literature

Journal of Biblical Literature - Society of Biblical Literature

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Friesen: Myth and Resistance in Revelation 13 295<br />

Truth Claims Credibility Authority<br />

Fable No No No<br />

Legend Yes No No<br />

History Yes Yes No<br />

Myth Yes Yes Yes<br />

Using these categories we can describe at least three ways in which people<br />

use myths and related narratives. 39<br />

1. Downgrading a myth to the status <strong>of</strong> history or legend by questioning<br />

the myth’s authority or credibility.<br />

2. Mythologizing history, legend, or fable by attributing authority and/or<br />

credibility to them so that they gain the status <strong>of</strong> myth.<br />

3. Reinterpreting established myths in new ways.<br />

Returning to the two imperial panels from the Sebasteion, we have clear<br />

examples <strong>of</strong> the mythologization <strong>of</strong> specific historical events. This is accomplished<br />

through stylistic decisions (such as the divine nudity) and through allusion<br />

to mythic narratives such as battles with amazons or to the Trojan War. 40<br />

The process does not create an allegory, however: in the myths, the amazons<br />

die; in history, the neighboring regions lived on, either forcibly absorbed into<br />

the empire or subdued and granted limited autonomy at the border. The process<br />

<strong>of</strong> mythologization worked by analogy rather than by allegory, proposing<br />

similarities between stories <strong>of</strong> the emperors and myths and thereby investing<br />

one with the authority <strong>of</strong> the other. Note also that the mythologization <strong>of</strong> imperial<br />

military strength was accomplished in a ritual setting. This combination <strong>of</strong><br />

new myth and ritual at the Sebasteion enforced the Roman social order. It<br />

incorporated the emperors into the myths <strong>of</strong> western Asia Minor, with particular<br />

emphasis on their military victories.<br />

Several other panels celebrated the victories <strong>of</strong> the emperors in mythic<br />

terms, 41 although it is no longer clear which emperors were displayed. A third<br />

panel for consideration interprets the ambivalent results <strong>of</strong> those victories (fig.<br />

9). The panel depicts an unidentified emperor standing next to a trophy (the<br />

armor <strong>of</strong> his fallen foe displayed on a pole). On the right stands a Roman figure,<br />

personifying either the senate or the people <strong>of</strong> Rome, who crowns the con-<br />

39 Lincoln provides specific modern examples <strong>of</strong> these deployments (Discourse, 15–23 and<br />

27–37).<br />

40 There is also in the Nero panel a hint <strong>of</strong> an allusion to the story <strong>of</strong> Menelaus retrieving the<br />

body <strong>of</strong> Patroklos (Smith, “Imperial Reliefs,” 118–19).<br />

41 There are four extant panels from the third story that portray winged Nikes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!