27.12.2012 Views

WHO ARE THE HUNS?

WHO ARE THE HUNS?

WHO ARE THE HUNS?

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Triple Entente's Vendetta of Lies. 219<br />

following chapter with regard to this "Atrocity Commission"<br />

and its work.<br />

The following points of view are also well taken:<br />

"A rôle by no means small is played in the reports of the<br />

Belgian Committee of Investigation by the alleged violated<br />

girls and women. Whoever has had any experience in legalpsychological<br />

matters, is all too well aware how many such<br />

accusations are the products of an excited imagination. It<br />

frequently happens that girls and women build up all sorts<br />

of sexual happenings out of their fantasies, and then, coming<br />

in contact with some quite innocent man, compel him to defend<br />

himself against charges of immorality.<br />

"As we have to contend with innumerable such cases even<br />

in times of peace, we are forced to adopt an attitude of the<br />

greatest distrust towards the report of this Belgian Committee<br />

of Investigation. It is well-known that hysterical women are<br />

peculiarly prone to accusations of this sort. It would be interesting<br />

to know whether the Belgian Commission called in the<br />

services of non-partisan, that is to say, non-Belgian nerve<br />

specialists ? Should this not be the case the Belgian Commission<br />

has laid itself open to the charge of a serious sin of omission, for<br />

many hysterical women are disposed to make an immoral<br />

crime out of a harmless accidental contact. And is it a mere<br />

coincidence—that famous case in Belgium of Louise Lateau<br />

and her stigmata? It was in the Bois d'Haine near Charleroi<br />

that Louise Lateau cropped up in 1868 and excited the<br />

fancy of the entire world."<br />

Dr. Moll calls attention in his expert review of the Belgian<br />

Report to the grave discrepancies in the testimony of individual<br />

witnesses and concludes with the observation that it is to be<br />

much regretted that the Belgian government should attempt<br />

to influence public opinion with such untrustworthy reports.<br />

All that Dr. Moll says of the Belgian Committee of Investigation<br />

is still more applicable to the wordy statements<br />

of the French Commission—in so far as these have become<br />

known to us through the press.<br />

It is unfortunate that the Germans waited for too long a<br />

period ere taking steps to refute in some degree the overwhelming<br />

slanders of the English, Belgian and French press. The so-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!