27.12.2012 Views

WHO ARE THE HUNS?

WHO ARE THE HUNS?

WHO ARE THE HUNS?

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

384 Exchange of German-American Notes.<br />

placed at a disadvantage by it—England which meanly and<br />

sneeringly rejected all proposals of mediation made by the<br />

United States.<br />

England, by reason of her mode of conducting her mercantile<br />

war and by reason of her proclaiming the North Sea<br />

as a zone of war, is alone responsible for all the consequences<br />

that have ensued. Germany, as we have seen in the foregoing,<br />

has expressed her willingness to give up this method of warfare<br />

if England would consent to give up her illegal "paper<br />

blockade" and contraband campaign. Here again the United<br />

States made application to the wrong party with their proffers of<br />

mediation. So far these have availed nothing and it is not likely<br />

that they will ever avail anything. England can be forced to<br />

budge only by force, by the "old system"—to adopt Mr. Bryan's<br />

phrase, and not by argument—or the "new system." Therefore,<br />

if the government of the United States would procure<br />

for its citizens the right of travelling freely upon the merchant<br />

ships of all nations without endangering their lives, let it first<br />

resort to force in order to prevent England from committing<br />

the most outrageous of all breaches of neutrality-—the misuse<br />

of other nations' flags—or from resorting to the use of auxiliary<br />

cruisers for the transportation of passengers.<br />

Precisely at the psychological moment Dr. Wehberg properly<br />

reminds us in the "Kôlnische Zeitung," of the following<br />

disquisition of the English delegate to the Hague Conference<br />

of 1907.<br />

"The English representative, Lord Reay, a member of<br />

the Privy Council and former President of the Institute of<br />

International Law, declared as follows;—his opinions constitute<br />

an important justification on the part of England for<br />

our entire procedure:<br />

"Ships which render such services, bestow a hostile support<br />

upon the belligerent, which his opponent cannot consider as permissible.<br />

They are through this subject to all the consequences<br />

entailed by the position of a regular belligerent. It is not a<br />

simple mercantile enterprise which is here in question, but an<br />

interference in the operations of war. The ships which undertake<br />

this supply service are unconditionally subject to the<br />

orders of the regular authorities of the belligerents. Their

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!