28.12.2012 Views

Redesigning Animal Agriculture

Redesigning Animal Agriculture

Redesigning Animal Agriculture

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

under development as a biopharmaceutical<br />

for the treatment of autoimmune diseases<br />

(Parker et al., 2004). Transgenic livestock<br />

are also being evaluated for the production<br />

of recombinant vaccines. Potential vaccines<br />

against malaria and rotavirus have been produced<br />

in milk of transgenic goats and rabbits,<br />

respectively (Behboodi et al., 2005).<br />

Recombinant human therapeutic antibodies<br />

are also being produced in the milk (Pollock<br />

et al., 1999) and blood (Grosse-Hovest et<br />

al., 2004) of transgenic animals. Moreover,<br />

human polyclonal antibodies have been<br />

produced in the blood of cattle following<br />

the introduction of an artificial chromosome<br />

containing the entire sequence for human<br />

immunoglobulin heavy and light chain loci<br />

into bovine fetal fibroblasts and then creating<br />

calves via NT (Kuroiwa et al., 2002). There<br />

has been an interesting development in the<br />

production of recombinant human butyrylcholinesterase,<br />

purified from transgenic<br />

goat’s milk, as a potential bioscavenger of<br />

organophosphorus nerve agents for affected<br />

military personnel or civilian casualties of<br />

bioterrorism (Cerasoli et al., 2005).<br />

The technology for generating transgenic<br />

livestock as bioreactors is well established,<br />

and there are numerous examples.<br />

But the path to commercialization is fraught<br />

with financial difficulty especially in terms<br />

of the purification costs, the timeframes<br />

involved in rigorous clinical testing and<br />

regulatory evaluation and the risk that the<br />

therapeutic being developed may ultimately<br />

fail. The enormity of these challenges<br />

were exemplified with the recent failure<br />

of PPL Therapeutics, one of the pioneers<br />

of biopharming, caught up in economic<br />

constraints and regulatory uncertainties<br />

(Powell, 2003). It is unclear what the future<br />

holds for the general utility of farm animal<br />

bioreactors in converting forage into valuable<br />

biopharmaceuticals. The use of plants<br />

to directly produce certain therapeutics<br />

appears be a strong competing technology.<br />

Plant-based molecular pharming systems<br />

have successfully produced functional<br />

human pharmaceutical proteins, recombinant<br />

antibodies and vaccines and offer<br />

several advantages over livestock bioreactors,<br />

such as lower production costs, greater<br />

Cloning and Transgenesis 103<br />

scale-up ability and enhanced safety due to<br />

absence of animal or human pathogens (Ma<br />

et al., 2003). Moreover, progress is being<br />

made in mammalian-like, post- translational<br />

processing of proteins, where this is important<br />

for functionality, in biologic ally unrelated<br />

production systems such as plants<br />

(Joshi and Lopez, 2005) and microorganisms<br />

(Gerngross, 2004). Functional proteins<br />

can even be chemically synthesized de novo<br />

(Kochendoerfer et al., 2003). In terms of ethical<br />

acceptance, the public are more likely<br />

to support the use of transgenic plants as<br />

bioreactors rather than animals (Einsiedel,<br />

2005). A more significant environmental<br />

issue with pharming plants is, however,<br />

control over their physical containment and<br />

spread.<br />

Xenotransplantation<br />

The shortage of human donor organs to treat<br />

chronic organ failure and various degenerative<br />

tissue diseases could be overcome by<br />

targeting specific genetic modifications<br />

to generate herds of pigs whose organs<br />

would be immunologically compatible<br />

with humans following xenotransplantation<br />

(Lanza et al., 1997). Pigs are favoured<br />

because of their similarities in organ size<br />

and physiology to humans, short generation<br />

interval and large litter size. Recently, pigs<br />

have been produced that completely lack<br />

the enzyme α-1,3-galactosyl-transferase<br />

(Phelps et al., 2003) in attempts to eliminate<br />

the specific carbohydrate epitope found on<br />

the cell surface in pigs, but not humans, to<br />

counter the complement-based hyperacute<br />

immune rejection that occurs within minutes<br />

of transplantation. However, low but<br />

detectable levels of the gal antigen may still<br />

persist on the pig cells (Sharma et al., 2003).<br />

None the less, initial evidence provides some<br />

encouragement with pig-to-baboon xenografts<br />

surviving for extended periods, up to<br />

83 days for kidneys (Yamada et al., 2005)<br />

and 2–6 months for hearts (Kuwaki et al.,<br />

2005). Subsequent immunosuppressive<br />

drug therapy or additional genetic modifications<br />

could be used to manage the human<br />

body’s other rejection processes to prolong<br />

the functionality of the organ. In using pig

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!