Precision <strong>Animal</strong> Breeding 79 Jansen, R.C., Johnson, D.L. and Van Arendonk, J.A. (1998) A mixture model approach to the mapping of quantitative trait loci in complex populations with an application to multiple cattle families. Genetics 148, 391–399. Jensen, P. and Andersson, L. (2005) Genomics meets ethology: a new route to understanding domestication, behaviour, and sustainability in animal breeding. Ambio 34, 320–324. Kappes, S.M., Keele, J.W., Stone, R.T., McGraw, R.A., Sonstegard, T.S., Smith, T.P., Lopez-Corrales, N.L. and Beattie, C.W. (1997) A second generation linkage map of the bovine genome. Genome Research 7, 235–249. Knott, S.A. and Haley, C.S. (1992) Maximum likelihood mapping of quantitative trait loci using full-sib families. Genetics 132, 1211–1222. Knott, S.A., Elsen, J.M. and Haley, C.S. (1994) Multiple marker mapping of quantitative trait loci in halfsib populations. Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. WCGALP, Guelph, Canada, pp. 33–36. Knott, S.A., Elsen, J.M. and Haley, C.S. (1996) Methods for multiple-marker mapping of quantitative trait loci in half-sib populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 93, 71–80. Knott, S.A., Marklund, L., Haley, C.S., Andersson, K., Davies, W., Ellegren, H., Fredholm, M., Hannson, I., Hoyheim, B., Lundstrom, K., Moller, M. and Andersson, L. (1998) Multiple marker mapping of quantitative trait loci in a cross between outbred wild boar and large white pigs. Genetics 149, 1069–1080. Kristenson, T.N. and Sorensen, A.C. (2005) Inbreeding – lessons from animal breeding, evolutionary biology and conservation genetics. <strong>Animal</strong> Science 80, 121–133. Lander, E.S. and Botstein, D. (1989) Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 121, 185–199. Le Roy, P., Elsen, J.M., Boichard, D., Mangin, B., Bidanel, J.P. and Goffinet, B. (1998) An algorithm for QTL detection in mixture of full and half sib families. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. (Ed.) Organizing Committee WCGALP, Armidale, NSW, pp. 257–260. Lehnert, S.A., Wang, Y.H. and Byrne, K.A. (2004) Development and application of a bovine cDNA microarray for expression profiling of muscle and adipose tissue. Australian Journal of Experimental <strong>Agriculture</strong> 44, 1127–1133. Lynch, M. and Walsh, B. (1998) Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland MA, USA. Mackinnon, M.J., Meyer, K. and Hetzel, D.J.S. (1991) Genetic variation and covariation for growth, parasite resistance and heat tolerance in tropical cattle. Livestock Production Science 27, 105–122. Meuwissen, T.H.E. and Goddard, M.E. (1997) Estimation of effects of quantitative trait loci in large complex pedigrees. Genetics 146, 409–416. Meuwissen, T.H.E. and Goddard, M.E. (2000) Final mapping of quantitative trait loci using linkage disequilibria with closely linked marker loci. Genetics 155, 421–430. Nobis, W., Ren, X., Suchyta, S.P., Suchyta, T.R., Zanella, A.J. and Coussens, P.M. (2003) Development of a porcine brain cDNA library, EST database, and microarray resource. Physiological Genomics 16, 153–159. Olson, T.A., Filho, K.E., Cundiff, L.V., Koger, M., Butts, W.T. Jr and Gregory, K.E. (1991) Effect of breed group by location interaction on crossbred cattle in Nebraska and Florida. Journal of <strong>Animal</strong> Science 69, 104–114. Olson, T.A., Lucena, C., Chase C.C. Jr, and Hammond, A.C. (2003) Evidence of a major gene influencing hair length and heat tolerance in Bos taurus cattle. Journal of <strong>Animal</strong> Science 81, 80–90. Orr, H.A. (2005) Theories of adaptation: what they do and don’t say. Genetica 123, 3–13. Patterson, H.D. and Thompson, R. (1971) Recovery of interblock information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 63, 83–92. Prayaga, K.C. (2003a) Evaluation of beef cattle genotypes and estimation of direct and maternal genetic effects in a tropical environment 1. Growth traits. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 1013–1025. Prayaga, K.C. (2003b) Evaluation of beef cattle genotypes and estimation of direct and maternal genetic effects in a tropical environment 2. Adaptive and temperament traits. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 1027–1038. Prayaga, K.C. (2003c) Final Report on Belmont Crossbreeding Project. Meat and Livestock Australia, Sydney. Prayaga, K.C. (2004) Evaluation of beef cattle genotypes and estimation of direct and maternal genetic effects in a tropical environment 3. Fertility and calf survival traits. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 811–824. Prayaga, K.C. and Henshall, J.M. (2005) Adaptability in tropical beef cattle: genetic parameters of growth, adaptive and temperament traits in a crossbred population. Australian Journal of Experimental <strong>Agriculture</strong> 45, 971–983.
80 K. Prayaga and A. Reverter Prayaga, K.C., Henshall, J.M. and Burrow, H.M. (2003) Optimization of breed proportions in tropically adapted beef composites based on growth and resistance traits. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of <strong>Animal</strong> Breeding and Genetics. AAABG, Melbourne, pp. 302–305. Prayaga, K.C., Barendse, W. and Burrow, H.M. (2006) Genetics of tropical adaptation. Proceedings of 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. WCGALP, Brazil, CDROM; Communication no. 16–01. Quaas, R.L. and Pollak, E.J. (1980) Mixed model methodology for farm and ranch beef cattle testing programs. Journal of <strong>Animal</strong> Science 51, 1277–1287. Reverter, A., Johnston, D.J., Ferguson, D.M., Perry, D., Goddard, M.E., Burrow, H.M., Oddy, V.H., Thompson, J.M. and Bindon, B.M. (2003) Genetic and phenotypic characterization of animal, carcass, and meat quality traits from temperate and tropically adapted beef breeds. 4. Correlations among animal, carcass, and meat quality traits. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 149–158. Reverter, A., Wang, Y.H., Byrne, K.A., Tan, S-H., Harper, G.S. and Lehnert, S.A. (2004) Joint analysis of multiple cDNA microarray studies via multivariate mixed models applied to genetic improvement of beef cattle. Journal of <strong>Animal</strong> Science 82, 3430–3439. Reverter, A., Barris, W., McWilliam, S.M., Byrne, K.A., Wang, Y.H., Tan, S-H., Hudson, N.J. and Dalrymple, B.P. (2005a) Validation of alternative methods of data normalization in gene co-expression studies. Bioinformatics 21, 1112–1120. Reverter, A., Barris, W., Moreno-Sánchez, N., McWilliam, S.M., Wang, Y.H., Harper, G.S., Lehnert, S.A. and Dalrymple, B.P. (2005b) Construction of gene interaction and regulatory networks in bovine skeletal muscle from expression data. Australian Journal of Experimental <strong>Agriculture</strong> 45, 821–829. Rocha, J.L., Pomp, D. and Van Vleck, L.D. (2002) QTL analysis in livestock. In: Camp, N.J. and Cox, A. (eds) Quantitative Trait Loci: Methods and Protocols. Humana Press Inc., Totowa, New Jersey, pp. 311–346. Schadt, E.E., Monks, S.A., Drake, T.A., Lusis, A.J., Che, N., Colinayo, V., Ruff, T.G., Milligan, S.B., Lamb, J.R., Cavet, G., Linsley, P.S., Mao, M., Stoughton, R.B. and Friend, S.H. (2003) Genetics of gene expression surveyed in maize, mouse and man. Nature 422, 297–302. Soller, M. and Genizi, A. (1978) The efficiency of experimental designs for the detection of linkage between a marker locus and a locus affecting a quantitative trait in segregating populations. Biometrics 34, 47–55. Suchyta, S.P., Sipkovsky, S., Kruska, R., Jeffers, A., McNulty, A., Coussens, M.J., Tempelman, R.J., Halgren, R.G., Saama, P.M., Bauman, D.E., Boisclair, Y.R., Burton, J.L., Collier, R.J., DePeters, E.J., Ferris, T.A., Lucy, M.C., McGuire, M.A., Medrano, J.F., Overton, T.R., Smith, T.P., Smith, G.W., Sonstegard, T.S., Spain, J.N., Spiers, D.E., Yao, J. and Coussens, P.M. (2003) Development and testing of a high-density cDNA microarray resource for cattle. Physiological Genomics 15, 158–164. Terwilliger, J.D. (2001) On the resolution and feasibility of genome scanning approaches. Advances in Genetics 42, 351–391. Turner, H.G. (1982) Genetic variation of rectal temperature in cows and its relationship to fertility. <strong>Animal</strong> Production 35, 401–412. Turner, H.G. (1984) Variation in rectal temperature of cattle in a tropical environment and its relation to growth rate. <strong>Animal</strong> Production 38, 417–427. Walsh, B. (2001) Quantitative genetics in the age of genomics. Theoretical Population Biology 59, 175–184. Weller, J.I., Kashi, Y. and Soller, M. (1990) Power of daughter and granddaughter designs for determining linkage between marker loci and quantitative trait loci in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 73, 2525–2537. Williams, J.L., Eggen, A., Ferretti, L., Farr, C.J., Gautier, M., Amati, G., Ball, G., Caramorr, T., Critcher, R., Costa, S., Hextall, P., Hills, D., Jeulin, A., Kiguwa, S.L., Ross, O., Smith, A.L., Saunier, K., Urquhart, B. and Waddington, D. (2002) A bovine whole genome radiation hybrid panel and outline map. Mammalian Genome 13, 469–474. Womack, J.E. (2005) Advances in livestock genomics: opening the barn door. Genome Research 15, 1699–1705. Womack, J.E. (2006) The impact of sequencing the bovine genome. Australian Journal of Experimental <strong>Agriculture</strong> 46, 151–153. Womack, J.E. and Moll, Y.D. (1986) Gene map of the cow: conservation of linkage with mouse and man. Journal of Heredity 77, 2–7. Womack, J.E., Johnson, J.S., Owen, E.K., Rexroad, C.E., Schlapfer, J. and Yang, Y.P. (1997) A whole-genome radiation hybrid panel for bovine gene mapping. Mammalian Genome 8, 854–856. Yerle, M., Lahbib-Mansais, Y., Mellink, C., Goureau, A., Pinton, P., Echard, G., Gellin, J., Zijlstra, C., De Haan, N., Bosma, A.A., Chowdhary, B., Gu, F., Gustavsson, I., Thomsen, P.D., Christensen, K., Rettenberger, G., Hameister, H., Schmitz, A., Chaput, B. and Frelat, G. (1995) The PiGMap Consortium cytogenetic map of the domestic pig (Sus scrofa domestica). Mammalian Genome 6, 176–186.
- Page 2 and 3:
Redesigning Animal Agriculture The
- Page 4 and 5:
Redesigning Animal Agriculture The
- Page 6 and 7:
Contents Contributors vii Acknowled
- Page 8 and 9:
Contributors Margaret Alston, Direc
- Page 10 and 11:
Acknowledgements “The editors gra
- Page 12 and 13:
Introduction to Redesigning Animal
- Page 14 and 15:
Introduction xiii factors). In rede
- Page 16 and 17:
1 Redesigning Animal Agriculture: a
- Page 18 and 19:
ing to the confusions and complexit
- Page 20 and 21:
such as environmental integrity alo
- Page 22 and 23:
The Systems Idea in Agriculture Sys
- Page 24 and 25:
These are all matters that are enti
- Page 26 and 27:
was intended to capture this vital
- Page 28 and 29:
wants and needs to be comprehensive
- Page 30 and 31:
people who can journey together tow
- Page 32 and 33:
A Systemic Perspective 17 Gunderson
- Page 34 and 35:
and telecommunications infrastructu
- Page 36 and 37:
y a move from a more intensive indu
- Page 38 and 39:
from 10 to 40% higher than urban Au
- Page 40 and 41:
in rural areas - environmental degr
- Page 42 and 43:
young people are leaving farms and
- Page 44 and 45: Maintaining Vibrant Rural Communiti
- Page 46 and 47: views in philosophical animal ethic
- Page 48 and 49: case of virtues) there are specific
- Page 50 and 51: animal ethics that is dominated by
- Page 52 and 53: involves a detailed analysis of the
- Page 54 and 55: to the idea that it is not wrong af
- Page 56 and 57: not show sufficient respect to anim
- Page 58 and 59: that ethical norms and ethical voca
- Page 60 and 61: Ethics of Livestock Science 45 Diam
- Page 62 and 63: plasticity of the genome and the po
- Page 64 and 65: a highly predictable and beneficial
- Page 66 and 67: immune response genes in both speci
- Page 68 and 69: annotate these regions. The Herefor
- Page 70 and 71: to their production source. This ca
- Page 72 and 73: cially viable genetic tests. One re
- Page 74 and 75: additive effects of the contributin
- Page 76 and 77: understanding the relationship betw
- Page 78 and 79: The Impact of Genomics 63 Mattick,
- Page 80 and 81: 5 Precision Animal Breeding Kishore
- Page 82 and 83: effects (e.g. contemporary groups,
- Page 84 and 85: the mean performance of the parenta
- Page 86 and 87: or even shipped out overseas as liv
- Page 88 and 89: tions underlying the desirable phen
- Page 90 and 91: 3. Markers 0.25 cM apart - through
- Page 92 and 93: Infinitesimal Model y = Xb + Z1u +
- Page 96 and 97: 6 Germ Cell Transplantation - a Nov
- Page 98 and 99: testicular environment could be ove
- Page 100 and 101: Brinster et al., 2003). Treatment o
- Page 102 and 103: ingly sought after to produce bioph
- Page 104 and 105: Acknowledgements Work from the auth
- Page 106 and 107: Germ Cell Transplantation 91 epigen
- Page 108 and 109: Germ Cell Transplantation 93 von Sc
- Page 110 and 111: own maternal chromosomes. This reco
- Page 112 and 113: eprogramming following NT, leading
- Page 114 and 115: species (Schnieke et al., 1997) and
- Page 116 and 117: lentivectors and RNA interference (
- Page 118 and 119: under development as a biopharmaceu
- Page 120 and 121: Rather than attempting to manipulat
- Page 122 and 123: strated in transgenic mice over-exp
- Page 124 and 125: Regulatory Issues The regulatory re
- Page 126 and 127: health, fitness and behaviour of th
- Page 128 and 129: goals. More specifically, it remain
- Page 130 and 131: Cloning and Transgenesis 115 Gama,
- Page 132 and 133: Cloning and Transgenesis 117 McCrea
- Page 134 and 135: Cloning and Transgenesis 119 Stinna
- Page 136 and 137: 8 Transforming Livestock with Trans
- Page 138 and 139: have been adapted to allow more pre
- Page 140 and 141: commercial lines is apparently not
- Page 142 and 143: protection of the genome against mo
- Page 144 and 145:
(Hammond et al., 2000). Binding of
- Page 146 and 147:
There are a number of ways to produ
- Page 148 and 149:
ules that determine siRNA activity
- Page 150 and 151:
known influenza A virus H subtypes
- Page 152 and 153:
will need to be balanced against th
- Page 154 and 155:
Transforming Livestock with Transge
- Page 156 and 157:
Transforming Livestock with Transge
- Page 158 and 159:
Transforming Livestock with Transge
- Page 160 and 161:
Introduction A key difficulty faced
- Page 162 and 163:
dation to probabilistic (e.g. a giv
- Page 164 and 165:
Similarly, the probability that a d
- Page 166 and 167:
One approach to the development of
- Page 168 and 169:
1 1 nb − ( m + mI ) m XS = ( m +
- Page 170 and 171:
1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 value of the st
- Page 172 and 173:
that shown in (9.9). In the sequel
- Page 174 and 175:
Metropolis-Hastings algorithm descr
- Page 176 and 177:
30 20 10 logging system composed of
- Page 178 and 179:
0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0e+00
- Page 180 and 181:
confronting models with data in thi
- Page 182 and 183:
This is especially surprising since
- Page 184 and 185:
Stochastic Process-based Modelling
- Page 186 and 187:
10 Reef Safe Beef: Environmentally
- Page 188 and 189:
and most beef is produced under ext
- Page 190 and 191:
Mean NDVI Burdekin Mean NDVI Fitzro
- Page 192 and 193:
High biomass/cover Also, the increa
- Page 194 and 195:
Good or ‘A’ condition has the f
- Page 196 and 197:
Value ($) Grazier disinclination of
- Page 198 and 199:
Reef Safe Beef 183 Ludwig, J.A., Wi
- Page 200 and 201:
11 Meeting Ecological Restoration T
- Page 202 and 203:
evidence of only slight degradation
- Page 204 and 205:
Throughout the UK, there are spatia
- Page 206 and 207:
Quarterly flow weighted mean nitrat
- Page 208 and 209:
suggest that the majority of inland
- Page 210 and 211:
Table 11.3. Current problems in dif
- Page 212 and 213:
of diffuse nutrient loading on wate
- Page 214 and 215:
● Introducing full nutrient budge
- Page 216 and 217:
following scenario 1, and scenario
- Page 218 and 219:
Ecological Restoration Targets 203
- Page 220 and 221:
This chapter draws on two examples
- Page 222 and 223:
(Firbank, 2005; Potter and Tilzey,
- Page 224 and 225:
growth in the export market has com
- Page 226 and 227:
the use of larger amounts of agroch
- Page 228 and 229:
need to establish partnerships with
- Page 230 and 231:
Social, Environmental and Economic
- Page 232 and 233:
adaptation to environment genetic b
- Page 234 and 235:
sequencing of 10, 000 non-redundant
- Page 236 and 237:
transfer of nutrients and micro-org
- Page 238 and 239:
genotypic value, and EBV 67-68 germ
- Page 240 and 241:
livestock transgenics for agricultu
- Page 242 and 243:
quantitative genetics use 66-69 sys
- Page 244 and 245:
speciesism 35 sperm-mediated gene t
- Page 246:
water quality EU Water Framework Di