28.12.2012 Views

Redesigning Animal Agriculture

Redesigning Animal Agriculture

Redesigning Animal Agriculture

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

112 D.N. Wells and G. Laible<br />

Adams et al., 2002). For loss- of-function<br />

transgenes, both alleles in progeny need<br />

to be inactivated. This will require an<br />

extra generation of breeding, with preferably<br />

another non-related transgenic sire<br />

harbouring the same genetic modification.<br />

The resulting homozygous knock-out<br />

individuals are then available for further<br />

selection and progress towards stably fixing<br />

the new genetic change into the herd or<br />

wider population. <strong>Animal</strong> industries may<br />

choose to regularly introduce the same<br />

transgene, ideally at the same locus, on a<br />

new genetic background using cell lines<br />

derived from the most recently selected<br />

progeny-tested sires, so as to capture the<br />

annual incremental genetic gains from conventional<br />

animal breeding and maintain<br />

genetic diversity. The economic benefits of<br />

a genetic modification affecting a production<br />

trait must be sufficiently large to compensate<br />

for the lag in genetic gain during<br />

the time taken to introduce the transgene<br />

and test its performance before wider dissemination.<br />

It has been estimated in some<br />

introgression schemes that the value of the<br />

transgene must be greater than 10% of the<br />

‘economic value’ of the trait in question,<br />

to at least match what could have been<br />

achieved through conventional selection<br />

and breeding (Gama et al., 1992).<br />

Perspective<br />

Since the domestication of livestock species,<br />

humans have been inadvertently redesigning<br />

the genetic make-up of their animals by<br />

selective breeding based on desirable phenotypic<br />

characteristics. This practice alters the<br />

frequency of many genes in an often unregulated<br />

manner. The new technologies of cloning<br />

from cultured cells and trans genesis with<br />

site-specific integration have the potential<br />

to allow a more targeted approach towards<br />

animal breeding. A tremendous opportunity<br />

exists with transgenesis to take production<br />

and health traits beyond the normal biological<br />

boundaries. <strong>Animal</strong>s can be engineered<br />

for specific purposes in ways that are not<br />

possible with either conventional breeding<br />

or genomic selection, which exploits the<br />

natural variation amongst the existing<br />

population. However, major advances are<br />

still required to realize this vision. This<br />

includes improved reprogramming of the<br />

donor genome following NT, an increased<br />

frequency of gene targeting in somatic cells<br />

and an intimate understanding of the biological<br />

systems involved. The identification<br />

of genes and regulatory elements that<br />

influence livestock production traits will<br />

enable the effective utilization of cloning to<br />

duplicate entire genotypes and for transgenesis<br />

to introduce precise genetic enhancements<br />

to progress animal breeding in the<br />

21st century.<br />

Despite the advances being made in<br />

science, there is continued debate as to the<br />

value of transgenic animals in agriculture. It<br />

is important to note, however, that the majority<br />

of the public do appear to be conditionally<br />

supportive of genetic modification and<br />

they want to see good practical examples<br />

demonstrating the benefits of the technology<br />

with minimal risk. Benefits improving<br />

the health of farmed livestock and/or of the<br />

consumer, along with solutions to environmental<br />

impacts of agriculture will undoubtedly<br />

be met with the greatest acceptance by<br />

the public. But for any of these outcomes<br />

to be realized the producer needs to benefit<br />

also, at least financially. A difficulty is that<br />

the technology is complex and each application<br />

often has a unique set of pros and<br />

cons. Research data are required to evaluate<br />

each potential transgenic application<br />

before industry, regulatory, and consumer<br />

acceptance are sought. These results need to<br />

be communicated effectively to the public,<br />

producers and regulatory agencies by members<br />

of the scientific community. It has been<br />

more than 20 years since the first transgenic<br />

farm animals were created and 10 years since<br />

the birth of Dolly. And it will be some time<br />

yet before specific genetic modifications in<br />

livestock are possibly adopted on farms and<br />

accepted in segments of the marketplace.<br />

This might not happen in isolation and<br />

alternative genetic technologies in plants<br />

may emerge with the potential to complement<br />

modified livestock and significantly<br />

enhance some common agri- biotechnology

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!