29.12.2012 Views

BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency and Refugee

BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency and Refugee

BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency and Refugee

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

110<br />

Survey of <strong>Palestinian</strong> <strong>Refugee</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Internally Displaced Persons (2006-2007)<br />

Children of Deheisha refugee camp commemorating the Nakba, May 2002, occupied West Bank. © <strong>BADIL</strong>.<br />

<strong>Refugee</strong>s who choose not to exercise<br />

the rights set <strong>for</strong>th in paragraph 11(a),<br />

however, may opt <strong>for</strong> local integration<br />

in host states or resettlement in<br />

third countries, as well as housing<br />

<strong>and</strong> property restitution <strong>and</strong><br />

compensation. Paragraph 11(b)<br />

“instructs” the UN Conciliation<br />

Commission <strong>for</strong> Palestine, the body<br />

m<strong>and</strong>ated to facilitate implementation<br />

of durable solutions <strong>for</strong> 1948 refugees,<br />

to facilitate the resettlement of those<br />

refugees choosing not to return, <strong>and</strong><br />

the payment of compensation. In<br />

other words, the sole trigger <strong>for</strong> the<br />

resettlement of <strong>Palestinian</strong> refugees<br />

displaced in 1948 is the voluntary<br />

choice of the refugee not to return to<br />

his or her place of origin.<br />

The UN General Assembly intended<br />

to confer upon individual refugees<br />

the “right of exercising a free choice<br />

as to their future.” 20 According to<br />

the UN Mediator in Palestine, the<br />

“unconditional right [of the refugees]<br />

to make a free choice should be fully<br />

respected.” 21 Furthermore, it was<br />

stated that “the verb ‘choose’ indicates<br />

that the General Assembly assumed<br />

that […] all the refugees would be<br />

given a free choice as to whether or<br />

not they wished to return home.” 22<br />

In order <strong>for</strong> refugees to make a free choice, the United Nations recognized that they would need to be “fully<br />

in<strong>for</strong>med of the conditions under which they would return.” 23 Moreover, the individual choice of the refugee was<br />

not to be influenced or hindered in any way by the relevant governments. General Assembly Resolution 194(III)<br />

affirms the principle of safe return. Resolution 194(III) not only imposes an obligation upon refugees choosing to<br />

return “to live at peace with their neighbours”, but also imposes an obligation upon Israel “to ensure the peace of<br />

the returning refugees <strong>and</strong> protect them from any elements seeking to disturb that peace.” 24<br />

Resolution 194(III) also provides a general timetable <strong>for</strong> the implementation of the return of the refugees. The<br />

debate during the drafting process of the resolution indicates that the Assembly “agreed that the refugees should<br />

be allowed to return when stable conditions were established. It would appear indisputable that such conditions<br />

were established by the signing of the four Armistice Agreements.” 25 The Assembly also rejected an amendment<br />

that included the phrase, “after the proclamation of peace between the contending parties in Palestine, including<br />

the Arab States.” 26<br />

The framework <strong>for</strong> durable solutions <strong>for</strong> <strong>Palestinian</strong> refugees <strong>and</strong> IDPs displaced in 1967 is set <strong>for</strong>th in<br />

paragraph 1 of UN Security Council Resolution 237, 14 June 1967. This calls upon Israel to facilitate the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!